Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 12-718.4
This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 12-718.4, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 12, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 12,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Standards for recognition of foreign-country judgment
Official statutory text
A. Except as otherwise provided in subsections B and C of this
section, a court of this state shall recognize a foreign-country
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 12. Civil Procedure Page 125
judgment to which the Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments
Recognition Act applies.
B. A court of this state may not recognize a foreign-country
judgment if:
1. The judgment was rendered under a judicial system that does
not provide impartial tribunals or procedures compatible with the
requirements of due process of law;
2. The foreign court did not have personal jurisdiction over
the defendant; or
3. The foreign court did not have jurisdiction over the subject
matter.
C. A court of this state need not recognize a foreign-country
judgment if:
1. The defendant in the proceeding in the foreign court did not
receive notice of the proceeding in sufficient time to enable the
defendant to defend;
2. The judgment was obtained by fraud that deprived the losing
party of an adequate opportunity to present its case;
3. The judgment or the cause of action on which the judgment is
based is repugnant to the public policy of this state or of the
United States;
4. The judgment conflicts with another final and conclusive
judgment;
5. The proceeding in the foreign court was contrary to an
agreement between the parties under which the dispute in question
was to be determined otherwise than by proceedings in that foreign
court;
6. In the case of jurisdiction based only on personal service,
the foreign court was a seriously inconvenient forum for the trial
of the action;
7. The judgment was rendered in circumstances that raise
substantial doubt about the integrity of the rendering court with
respect to the judgment; or
8. The specific proceeding in the foreign court leading to the
judgment was not compatible with the requirements of due process of
law.
D. A party resisting recognition of a foreign-country judgment
has the burden of establishing that a ground for nonrecognition
stated in subsection B or C of this section exists.
section, a court of this state shall recognize a foreign-country
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 12. Civil Procedure Page 125
judgment to which the Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments
Recognition Act applies.
B. A court of this state may not recognize a foreign-country
judgment if:
1. The judgment was rendered under a judicial system that does
not provide impartial tribunals or procedures compatible with the
requirements of due process of law;
2. The foreign court did not have personal jurisdiction over
the defendant; or
3. The foreign court did not have jurisdiction over the subject
matter.
C. A court of this state need not recognize a foreign-country
judgment if:
1. The defendant in the proceeding in the foreign court did not
receive notice of the proceeding in sufficient time to enable the
defendant to defend;
2. The judgment was obtained by fraud that deprived the losing
party of an adequate opportunity to present its case;
3. The judgment or the cause of action on which the judgment is
based is repugnant to the public policy of this state or of the
United States;
4. The judgment conflicts with another final and conclusive
judgment;
5. The proceeding in the foreign court was contrary to an
agreement between the parties under which the dispute in question
was to be determined otherwise than by proceedings in that foreign
court;
6. In the case of jurisdiction based only on personal service,
the foreign court was a seriously inconvenient forum for the trial
of the action;
7. The judgment was rendered in circumstances that raise
substantial doubt about the integrity of the rendering court with
respect to the judgment; or
8. The specific proceeding in the foreign court leading to the
judgment was not compatible with the requirements of due process of
law.
D. A party resisting recognition of a foreign-country judgment
has the burden of establishing that a ground for nonrecognition
stated in subsection B or C of this section exists.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?
Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.