Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 12-952
This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 12-952, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 12, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 12,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Jurisdiction of Supreme Court
Official statutory text
(a) The Supreme Court may reverse, vacate or modify judgments of
the district court for errors appearing on the record, and in the
reversal of such judgment may reverse, vacate or modify any
intermediate order involving the merits of the action, or any
portion thereof.
(b) The Supreme Court may reverse, vacate or modify any of the
following orders of the district court, or a judge thereof:
1. A final order;
2. An order that discharges, vacates or modifies or refuses to
vacate or modify a provisional remedy which affects the substantial
rights of a party; or grants, refuses, vacates, modifies or refuses
to vacate or modify an injunction; grants or refuses a new trial; or
vacates or refuses to vacate a final judgment;
3. Any other order, which affects a substantial part of the
merits of the controversy when the trial judge certifies that an
immediate appeal may materially advance the ultimate termination of
the litigation; provided, however, that the Supreme Court, in its
discretion, may refuse to hear the appeal. If the Supreme Court
assumes jurisdiction of the appeal, it shall indicate in its order
whether the action in the trial court shall be stayed or shall
continue.
The failure of a party to appeal from an order that is
appealable under either subdivision 2 or 3 of subsection (b) of this
section shall not preclude him from asserting error in the order
after the judgment or final order is rendered.
R.L. 1910, § 5236. Amended by Laws 1955, p. 135, § 1; Laws 1968, c.
290, § 1, eff. Jan. 13, 1969.
the district court for errors appearing on the record, and in the
reversal of such judgment may reverse, vacate or modify any
intermediate order involving the merits of the action, or any
portion thereof.
(b) The Supreme Court may reverse, vacate or modify any of the
following orders of the district court, or a judge thereof:
1. A final order;
2. An order that discharges, vacates or modifies or refuses to
vacate or modify a provisional remedy which affects the substantial
rights of a party; or grants, refuses, vacates, modifies or refuses
to vacate or modify an injunction; grants or refuses a new trial; or
vacates or refuses to vacate a final judgment;
3. Any other order, which affects a substantial part of the
merits of the controversy when the trial judge certifies that an
immediate appeal may materially advance the ultimate termination of
the litigation; provided, however, that the Supreme Court, in its
discretion, may refuse to hear the appeal. If the Supreme Court
assumes jurisdiction of the appeal, it shall indicate in its order
whether the action in the trial court shall be stayed or shall
continue.
The failure of a party to appeal from an order that is
appealable under either subdivision 2 or 3 of subsection (b) of this
section shall not preclude him from asserting error in the order
after the judgment or final order is rendered.
R.L. 1910, § 5236. Amended by Laws 1955, p. 135, § 1; Laws 1968, c.
290, § 1, eff. Jan. 13, 1969.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?
Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.