Okla. Stat. tit. 13, § 13-176.13
This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 13, § 13-176.13, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 13, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 13,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Suppression of intercepted communication or evidence
Official statutory text
derived therefrom.
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 13. Common Carriers Page 26
A. Any aggrieved person in any trial, hearing or proceeding in
or before any court, department, officer, agency, regulatory body or
other authority may move to suppress the contents of any intercepted
wire, oral or electronic communication, or evidence derived
therefrom, on the grounds that:
1. The communication was unlawfully intercepted;
2. The order of authorization under which it was intercepted is
insufficient on its face; or
3. The interception was not made in conformity with the order
of authorization.
B. Said motion shall be made before the trial, hearing or
proceeding unless there was no opportunity to make the motion or the
aggrieved person was not aware of the grounds of the motion. If the
motion is granted, the contents of the intercepted wire, oral or
electronic communication, or evidence derived therefrom, shall be
treated as having been obtained in violation of the Security of
Communications Act. The judge, upon the filing of the motion by the
aggrieved person, may make available to the aggrieved person or his
counsel for inspection such portions of the intercepted
communication or evidence derived therefrom as the judge determines
to be in the interests of justice.
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 13. Common Carriers Page 26
A. Any aggrieved person in any trial, hearing or proceeding in
or before any court, department, officer, agency, regulatory body or
other authority may move to suppress the contents of any intercepted
wire, oral or electronic communication, or evidence derived
therefrom, on the grounds that:
1. The communication was unlawfully intercepted;
2. The order of authorization under which it was intercepted is
insufficient on its face; or
3. The interception was not made in conformity with the order
of authorization.
B. Said motion shall be made before the trial, hearing or
proceeding unless there was no opportunity to make the motion or the
aggrieved person was not aware of the grounds of the motion. If the
motion is granted, the contents of the intercepted wire, oral or
electronic communication, or evidence derived therefrom, shall be
treated as having been obtained in violation of the Security of
Communications Act. The judge, upon the filing of the motion by the
aggrieved person, may make available to the aggrieved person or his
counsel for inspection such portions of the intercepted
communication or evidence derived therefrom as the judge determines
to be in the interests of justice.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?
Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.