Okla. Stat. tit. 2, § 2-6-93

This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 2, § 2-6-93, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 2, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 2,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Blood samples for brucellosis testing – Official

Official statutory text

identification – Reports.

A. Whenever any blood sample is drawn for the purpose of

testing for brucellosis, the person drawing the blood sample shall

ensure application of official identification, approved by the State

Veterinarian. If official identification is already present, that

official identification shall be recorded.

B. The person shall submit with the blood sample a written

report to the State Veterinarian. The report shall be signed by the

person drawing the sample and shall be on a form prescribed by the

State Veterinarian. The report shall show the official

identification and descriptive markings of the animal, or herd

tattoo, if the tested animal is a registered animal.

C. It shall not be necessary to officially identify any

registered animal if the registration tattoo of each animal is shown

Oklahoma Statutes - Title 2. Agriculture Page 247

on the report. If the registration paper is not transferred with

the animal, official identification shall be applied.

D. The removal of official identification without prior

authorization from the State Veterinarian shall be a violation of

the Oklahoma Agricultural Code.

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?

Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.