Okla. Stat. tit. 43, § 43-106
This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 43, § 43-106, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 43, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 43,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Response
Official statutory text
A. The respondent, in his or her response, may allege a cause
for a dissolution of marriage, annulment of the marriage or legal
separation against the petitioner, and may have the same relief
thereupon as he or she would be entitled to for a like cause if he
or she were the petitioner.
B. When new matter is set up in the answer, it shall be
verified as to such new matter by the affidavit of the respondent.
R.L. 1910, § 4965. Renumbered from § 1274 of Title 12 by Laws 1989,
c. 333, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 1989. Amended by Laws 2002, c. 400, § 4,
eff. Nov. 1, 2002; Laws 2003, c. 302, § 2, emerg. eff. May 28, 2003.
for a dissolution of marriage, annulment of the marriage or legal
separation against the petitioner, and may have the same relief
thereupon as he or she would be entitled to for a like cause if he
or she were the petitioner.
B. When new matter is set up in the answer, it shall be
verified as to such new matter by the affidavit of the respondent.
R.L. 1910, § 4965. Renumbered from § 1274 of Title 12 by Laws 1989,
c. 333, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 1989. Amended by Laws 2002, c. 400, § 4,
eff. Nov. 1, 2002; Laws 2003, c. 302, § 2, emerg. eff. May 28, 2003.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?
Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.