Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 47-6-103.1

This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 47-6-103.1, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 47, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 47,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Parental objection to licensing of unemancipated

Official statutory text

child.

A. Any legal custodial parent or legal guardian may prohibit

the licensing of or cause the cancellation of a license previously

issued to his or her unemancipated child by filing an objection with

Service Oklahoma on a form prescribed by Service Oklahoma. Service

Oklahoma shall refuse to issue or shall cancel a license when an

objection has been properly filed by a legal custodial parent or

legal guardian. A license may not be issued and a previous license

shall remain canceled until the objection is withdrawn by the legal

custodial parent or legal guardian or until the child attains

eighteen (18) years of age. A license canceled because a legal

custodial parent or legal guardian has filed an objection may be

reinstated only after a period of three (3) months. No fee shall be

assessed by Service Oklahoma for reinstatement of a license pursuant

to the provisions of this act.

B. No legal custodial parent or legal guardian shall be found

liable for negligent entrustment of an unemancipated child for

failure to file an objection pursuant to the provisions of this

section.

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?

Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.