Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 63-1-1432.5

This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 63-1-1432.5, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 63, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 63,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Violations - Penalties

Official statutory text

A. The owner or manager of a vendor who violates any of the

provisions of Section 3 or 4 of this act shall be punished by an

administrative penalty of not more than Five Hundred Dollars

($500.00) for a first offense and not more than One Thousand Dollars

($1,000.00) for a second offense. Upon a third offense, the vendor

shall be prohibited from selling kratom products for a period of

three (3) years. If the State Department of Health receives a

complaint that the owner or manager of a vendor is selling kratom

products during the period of suspension, then the State Department

of Health shall forward the information to the applicable district

attorney's office. If the owner or manager of a vendor commits such

violation during the three-year period, the person shall, upon

conviction, be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in

a county jail for a term of not more than one (1) year, or by a fine

of not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00), or by both such

fine and imprisonment.

B. A person aggrieved by a violation of Section 3 or 4 of this

act may bring a cause of action in a court of competent jurisdiction

Oklahoma Statutes - Title 63. Public Health and Safety Page 622

for damages resulting from that violation including, but not limited

to, economic, noneconomic or consequential damages.

C. A vendor does not violate the provisions of Section 3 or 4

of this act if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence

that the vendor relied in good faith on the representation of a

manufacturer, processor, packager or distributor that the food

product or dietary ingredient was a kratom product.

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?

Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.