Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 63-1-539.3
This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 63-1-539.3, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 63, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 63,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Uniform rules to be promulgated by certain state
Official statutory text
agencies.
A. By March 1, 2004, each of the state agencies specified in
subsection C of this section shall have promulgated uniform
emergency rules and shall have submitted proposed permanent uniform
rules to the Governor and Legislature pursuant to the Administrative
Procedures Act for the use of needleless systems and engineered
sharps injury protection in this state. Specifically the uniform
rules shall require:
1. That each public or private health care facility or location
have a written exposure control plan for risk exposure to bloodborne
pathogens;
2. That sharps prevention technology be included as engineering
or work practice controls in high exposure areas, except in cases
where the employer or other appropriate party can demonstrate
circumstances in which the technology does not promote employee or
patient safety or interferes with a medical procedure. Those
circumstances shall be specified in the control plan, and shall
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 63. Public Health and Safety Page 237
include, but not be limited to, circumstances where the technology
is medically contraindicated or not more effective than alternative
measures used by the employer to prevent exposure incidents in high
exposure areas;
3. That the written exposure control plans include an effective
procedure for identifying and selecting existing sharps prevention
technology in high exposure areas;
4. That a written exposure control plan be updated when
necessary to reflect progress in implementing the sharps prevention
technology specified by the Committee and promulgated by rule of the
regulating agency;
5. That information concerning exposure incidents be recorded
in a sharps injury log, including, but not limited to, the type and
brand of device involved in the incident; and
6. Such other requirements deemed necessary by the Needlestick
Injury Prevention Committee.
B. The failure of any agency to promulgate rules consistent
with the provisions of the Needlestick Injury Prevention Act shall
be reported by the Committee in writing to the Speaker of the House
of Representatives and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate.
C. Each of the following agencies shall promulgate uniform
rules and procedures for the use of needleless systems and
engineered sharps injury protection in compliance with the
provisions of the Needlestick Injury Prevention Act:
1. The State Department of Health; and
2. The State Department of Labor.
D. Upon notification by the Committee that the use of sharps
prevention technology is adequate, the rule-making agency shall
rescind rules promulgated pursuant to the provisions of the
Needlestick Injury Prevention Act.
A. By March 1, 2004, each of the state agencies specified in
subsection C of this section shall have promulgated uniform
emergency rules and shall have submitted proposed permanent uniform
rules to the Governor and Legislature pursuant to the Administrative
Procedures Act for the use of needleless systems and engineered
sharps injury protection in this state. Specifically the uniform
rules shall require:
1. That each public or private health care facility or location
have a written exposure control plan for risk exposure to bloodborne
pathogens;
2. That sharps prevention technology be included as engineering
or work practice controls in high exposure areas, except in cases
where the employer or other appropriate party can demonstrate
circumstances in which the technology does not promote employee or
patient safety or interferes with a medical procedure. Those
circumstances shall be specified in the control plan, and shall
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 63. Public Health and Safety Page 237
include, but not be limited to, circumstances where the technology
is medically contraindicated or not more effective than alternative
measures used by the employer to prevent exposure incidents in high
exposure areas;
3. That the written exposure control plans include an effective
procedure for identifying and selecting existing sharps prevention
technology in high exposure areas;
4. That a written exposure control plan be updated when
necessary to reflect progress in implementing the sharps prevention
technology specified by the Committee and promulgated by rule of the
regulating agency;
5. That information concerning exposure incidents be recorded
in a sharps injury log, including, but not limited to, the type and
brand of device involved in the incident; and
6. Such other requirements deemed necessary by the Needlestick
Injury Prevention Committee.
B. The failure of any agency to promulgate rules consistent
with the provisions of the Needlestick Injury Prevention Act shall
be reported by the Committee in writing to the Speaker of the House
of Representatives and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate.
C. Each of the following agencies shall promulgate uniform
rules and procedures for the use of needleless systems and
engineered sharps injury protection in compliance with the
provisions of the Needlestick Injury Prevention Act:
1. The State Department of Health; and
2. The State Department of Labor.
D. Upon notification by the Committee that the use of sharps
prevention technology is adequate, the rule-making agency shall
rescind rules promulgated pursuant to the provisions of the
Needlestick Injury Prevention Act.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?
Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.