Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 63-2-101.1
This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 63-2-101.1, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 63, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 63,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Drug paraphernalia - Factors used in determining
Official statutory text
In determining whether an object is “drug paraphernalia”, a
court or jury shall consider, in addition to all other logically
relevant factors, the following:
1. Statements by an owner or by anyone in control of the object
concerning its use;
2. The proximity of the object, in time and space, to a direct
violation of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act;
3. The proximity of the object to controlled dangerous
substances;
4. The existence of any residue of controlled dangerous
substances on the object;
5. Direct or circumstantial evidence of the intent of an owner,
or of anyone in control of the object, to deliver it to any person
who intends to use the object to facilitate a violation of the
Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act. The innocence of an
owner, or of anyone in control of the object, as to a direct
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 63. Public Health and Safety Page 888
violation of this act shall not prevent a finding that the object is
intended for use, or fashioned specifically for use, as drug
paraphernalia;
6. Instructions, oral or written, provided with the object
which either state directly or imply that the object is to be used
for the consumption of controlled dangerous substances;
7. Descriptive materials accompanying the object which explain
or depict its use as an object for the consumption of controlled
dangerous substances;
8. The manner in which the object is displayed for sale;
9. Whether the owner, or anyone in control of the object, is a
legitimate supplier of like or related items to the community, such
as a licensed distributor or dealer of tobacco products;
10. Direct or circumstantial evidence of the ratio of sales of
the object or objects to the total sales of the business enterprise;
11. The existence and scope of legitimate uses for the object
in the community; and
12. Expert testimony concerning its use.
Provided, nothing in this section shall apply to objects in the
possession of harm-reduction services providers as authorized by
Section 3 of this act.
court or jury shall consider, in addition to all other logically
relevant factors, the following:
1. Statements by an owner or by anyone in control of the object
concerning its use;
2. The proximity of the object, in time and space, to a direct
violation of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act;
3. The proximity of the object to controlled dangerous
substances;
4. The existence of any residue of controlled dangerous
substances on the object;
5. Direct or circumstantial evidence of the intent of an owner,
or of anyone in control of the object, to deliver it to any person
who intends to use the object to facilitate a violation of the
Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act. The innocence of an
owner, or of anyone in control of the object, as to a direct
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 63. Public Health and Safety Page 888
violation of this act shall not prevent a finding that the object is
intended for use, or fashioned specifically for use, as drug
paraphernalia;
6. Instructions, oral or written, provided with the object
which either state directly or imply that the object is to be used
for the consumption of controlled dangerous substances;
7. Descriptive materials accompanying the object which explain
or depict its use as an object for the consumption of controlled
dangerous substances;
8. The manner in which the object is displayed for sale;
9. Whether the owner, or anyone in control of the object, is a
legitimate supplier of like or related items to the community, such
as a licensed distributor or dealer of tobacco products;
10. Direct or circumstantial evidence of the ratio of sales of
the object or objects to the total sales of the business enterprise;
11. The existence and scope of legitimate uses for the object
in the community; and
12. Expert testimony concerning its use.
Provided, nothing in this section shall apply to objects in the
possession of harm-reduction services providers as authorized by
Section 3 of this act.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?
Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.