Okla. Stat. tit. 74, § 74-840-1.14
This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 74, § 74-840-1.14, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 74, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 74,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Attorney General as legal counsel - Opinions to
Official statutory text
officers or employees - Representation of Commission - Conflict of
interest - Appointment of alternate counsel.
When any officer or employee of the state is in doubt as to the
application of the Oklahoma Personnel Act as to himself or to any
employee under his supervision, he may submit to the Attorney
General a full written statement of the facts and questions he may
have. The Attorney General shall then render an opinion to such
person and may publish these opinions, or abstracts thereof, with
the use of the name of the person advised unless such person
requests otherwise in writing. The Attorney General shall be the
legal counsel for the Oklahoma Merit Protection Commission and
represent it when its decisions are appealed to higher courts. The
Office of the Attorney General shall be legal counsel for and
represent the Merit Protection Commission notwithstanding its
representation of any other state department, agency, board or
commission in the same or related matters pending before the Merit
Protection Commission or before any court. The Attorney General
shall establish internal administrative procedures to ensure that
both such agencies are provided independent legal representation,
and such simultaneous representation shall not, of itself, be deemed
to constitute a conflict of interest. In the event the Attorney
General determines an irreconcilable conflict of interest exists, to
the extent that he is unable to provide simultaneous representation
to both the Merit Protection Commission and another state
department, agency, board or commission the provision of Section
18c-2 of this title shall apply.
interest - Appointment of alternate counsel.
When any officer or employee of the state is in doubt as to the
application of the Oklahoma Personnel Act as to himself or to any
employee under his supervision, he may submit to the Attorney
General a full written statement of the facts and questions he may
have. The Attorney General shall then render an opinion to such
person and may publish these opinions, or abstracts thereof, with
the use of the name of the person advised unless such person
requests otherwise in writing. The Attorney General shall be the
legal counsel for the Oklahoma Merit Protection Commission and
represent it when its decisions are appealed to higher courts. The
Office of the Attorney General shall be legal counsel for and
represent the Merit Protection Commission notwithstanding its
representation of any other state department, agency, board or
commission in the same or related matters pending before the Merit
Protection Commission or before any court. The Attorney General
shall establish internal administrative procedures to ensure that
both such agencies are provided independent legal representation,
and such simultaneous representation shall not, of itself, be deemed
to constitute a conflict of interest. In the event the Attorney
General determines an irreconcilable conflict of interest exists, to
the extent that he is unable to provide simultaneous representation
to both the Merit Protection Commission and another state
department, agency, board or commission the provision of Section
18c-2 of this title shall apply.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?
Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.