Okla. Stat. tit. 85A, § 85A-72
This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 85A, § 85A-72, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 85A, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 85A,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Conduct of Hearing or Inquiry - Public hearings -
Official statutory text
Evidence.
A. Conduct of Hearing or Inquiry.
1. In making an investigation or inquiry or conducting a
hearing, the administrative law judges and the Commission shall not
be bound by technical or statutory rules of evidence or by technical
or formal rules of procedure, except as provided by this act. The
administrative law judges and the Commission may make such
investigation or inquiry, or conduct the hearing, in a manner as
shall best ascertain the rights of the parties.
2. Declarations of a deceased employee concerning the injury
may be received in evidence and may, if corroborated by other
evidence, be sufficient to establish the injury.
3. When deciding any issue, administrative law judges and the
Commission shall determine, on the basis of the record as a whole,
whether the party having the burden of proof on the issue has
established the proof by a preponderance of evidence.
4. Administrative law judges are required to make specific, on-
the-record findings of ultimate facts responsive to the issues
shaped by the evidence as well as conclusions of law on which its
judgment is to be rested.
B. Hearings to be Public - Records.
1. a. Hearings before the Commission shall be open to the
public and shall be stenographically reported. The
Commission is authorized to contract for the reporting
of the hearings.
b. The Commission shall, by rule, provide for the
preparation of a record of all hearings and other
proceedings before it.
2. The Commission shall not be required to stenographically
report or prepare a record of joint petition hearings. The
administrative law judge or legal advisor shall record the hearing
at no cost to the parties.
C. Introduction of Evidence.
1. All oral evidence or documentary evidence shall be presented
to the designated representative of the Commission at the initial
hearing on a controverted claim. The oral evidence shall be
stenographically reported. Each party shall present all evidence at
the initial hearing. Further hearings for the purpose of
introducing additional evidence shall be granted only at the
discretion of the hearing officer or Commission. A request for a
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 85A. Workers' Compensation Page 103
hearing for the introduction of additional evidence shall show the
substance of the evidence desired to be presented.
2. a. Any party proposing to introduce medical reports or
testimony of physicians at the hearing of a
controverted claim shall, as a condition precedent to
the right to do so, furnish to the opposing party and
to the Commission copies of the written reports of the
physicians of their findings and opinions at least
seven (7) days before the date of the hearing. If no
written reports are available to a party, the party
shall notify in writing the opposing party and the
Commission of the name and address of the physicians
proposed to be used as witnesses and the substance of
their testimony at least seven (7) days before the
hearing.
b. If the opposing party desires to cross-examine the
physician, he or she should notify the party who
submits a medical report to him or her as soon as
practicable, in order that he or she may make every
effort to have the physician present for the hearing.
3. A party failing to observe the requirements of this
subsection may not be allowed to introduce medical reports or
testimony of physicians at a hearing, except in the discretion of
the hearing officer or the Commission.
4. The time periods may be waived by the consent of the
parties.
D. Expert testimony shall not be allowed unless it satisfies
the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 with annotations
and amendments.
A. Conduct of Hearing or Inquiry.
1. In making an investigation or inquiry or conducting a
hearing, the administrative law judges and the Commission shall not
be bound by technical or statutory rules of evidence or by technical
or formal rules of procedure, except as provided by this act. The
administrative law judges and the Commission may make such
investigation or inquiry, or conduct the hearing, in a manner as
shall best ascertain the rights of the parties.
2. Declarations of a deceased employee concerning the injury
may be received in evidence and may, if corroborated by other
evidence, be sufficient to establish the injury.
3. When deciding any issue, administrative law judges and the
Commission shall determine, on the basis of the record as a whole,
whether the party having the burden of proof on the issue has
established the proof by a preponderance of evidence.
4. Administrative law judges are required to make specific, on-
the-record findings of ultimate facts responsive to the issues
shaped by the evidence as well as conclusions of law on which its
judgment is to be rested.
B. Hearings to be Public - Records.
1. a. Hearings before the Commission shall be open to the
public and shall be stenographically reported. The
Commission is authorized to contract for the reporting
of the hearings.
b. The Commission shall, by rule, provide for the
preparation of a record of all hearings and other
proceedings before it.
2. The Commission shall not be required to stenographically
report or prepare a record of joint petition hearings. The
administrative law judge or legal advisor shall record the hearing
at no cost to the parties.
C. Introduction of Evidence.
1. All oral evidence or documentary evidence shall be presented
to the designated representative of the Commission at the initial
hearing on a controverted claim. The oral evidence shall be
stenographically reported. Each party shall present all evidence at
the initial hearing. Further hearings for the purpose of
introducing additional evidence shall be granted only at the
discretion of the hearing officer or Commission. A request for a
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 85A. Workers' Compensation Page 103
hearing for the introduction of additional evidence shall show the
substance of the evidence desired to be presented.
2. a. Any party proposing to introduce medical reports or
testimony of physicians at the hearing of a
controverted claim shall, as a condition precedent to
the right to do so, furnish to the opposing party and
to the Commission copies of the written reports of the
physicians of their findings and opinions at least
seven (7) days before the date of the hearing. If no
written reports are available to a party, the party
shall notify in writing the opposing party and the
Commission of the name and address of the physicians
proposed to be used as witnesses and the substance of
their testimony at least seven (7) days before the
hearing.
b. If the opposing party desires to cross-examine the
physician, he or she should notify the party who
submits a medical report to him or her as soon as
practicable, in order that he or she may make every
effort to have the physician present for the hearing.
3. A party failing to observe the requirements of this
subsection may not be allowed to introduce medical reports or
testimony of physicians at a hearing, except in the discretion of
the hearing officer or the Commission.
4. The time periods may be waived by the consent of the
parties.
D. Expert testimony shall not be allowed unless it satisfies
the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 with annotations
and amendments.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?
Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.