18 Pa.C.S. § 1107.1

This is the official text of 18 Pa.C.S. § 1107.1, part of Pennsylvania’s Pa.C.S — part of the compiled statutory law of Pennsylvania, published by the state as "Pa.C.S." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Restitution for identity theft.

Official statutory text

(a) General rule.--The court shall, in addition to any other restitution sentence or order authorized by law, sentence a person convicted of a violation of section 4106 (relating to access device fraud) or 4120 (relating to identity theft) to make restitution for all reasonable expenses incurred by the victim or on the victim's behalf:

(1) to investigate theft of the victim's identity;

(2) to bring or defend civil or criminal actions related to theft of the victim's identity; or

(3) to take other efforts to correct the victim's credit record or negative credit reports related to theft of the victim's identity.

(b) Types of expenses.--The types of expenses recoverable under this section include, but are not limited to:

(1) fees for professional services by attorneys or accountants;

(2) fees and costs imposed by credit bureaus, associated with efforts to correct the victim's credit record, incurred in private investigations or associated with contesting unwarranted debt collections; and

(3) court costs and filing fees. (Sept. 18, 2009, P.L.391, No.42, eff. 60 days) 2009 Amendment. Act 42 added section 1107.1.

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in Pennsylvania?

Find a Pennsylvania lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.