S.D. Codified Laws § 34A-2B-3
This is the official text of S.D. Codified Laws § 34A-2B-3, part of South Dakota’s Codified Laws — part of the compiled statutory law of South Dakota, published by the state as "Codified Laws." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Expenditure of funds by secretary
Official statutory text
If necessary in the performance of duties under the environmental statutes in Title 34A, the secretary may expend money from the environmental livestock cleanup fund to provide for the costs of investigations, emergency remedial efforts, corrective actions, and managerial or administrative activities associated with such activities resulting from a discharge. The secretary's use of the environmental livestock cleanup fund shall be based upon the following:
(1) In the case of an investigation, when the secretary determines that a discharge has probably occurred and that the general operating budget of the department for such purposes is not adequate to cover the costs of the necessary investigatory activities;
(2) In the case of an emergency remedial effort, when the secretary determines that a discharge has occurred and that corrective actions shall be immediately undertaken to protect an imminent threat to the public health or safety or to contain a discharge which, if not immediately contained, will in time pose a significantly greater threat to public health or safety or to the environment of this state than if such action is not immediately taken;
(3) In the case of a discharge not of an emergency nature when the secretary determines that a discharge has occurred, that a responsible party or liability fund capable of performing the corrective actions either cannot be identified or refuses to undertake corrective actions, and that corrective actions shall be undertaken to protect the public health, safety, welfare, or environment of the state; or
(4) In the case of corrective action required at a livestock operation when the secretary determines that the potential for a discharge exists, that an owner, operator, or liability fund capable of performing the corrective actions either cannot be identified, refuses or is unable to undertake corrective actions, and that corrective action must be undertaken to protect against an imminent threat to the public health, safety, welfare, or environment of the state.
Source: SL 1998, ch 216, § 6.
(1) In the case of an investigation, when the secretary determines that a discharge has probably occurred and that the general operating budget of the department for such purposes is not adequate to cover the costs of the necessary investigatory activities;
(2) In the case of an emergency remedial effort, when the secretary determines that a discharge has occurred and that corrective actions shall be immediately undertaken to protect an imminent threat to the public health or safety or to contain a discharge which, if not immediately contained, will in time pose a significantly greater threat to public health or safety or to the environment of this state than if such action is not immediately taken;
(3) In the case of a discharge not of an emergency nature when the secretary determines that a discharge has occurred, that a responsible party or liability fund capable of performing the corrective actions either cannot be identified or refuses to undertake corrective actions, and that corrective actions shall be undertaken to protect the public health, safety, welfare, or environment of the state; or
(4) In the case of corrective action required at a livestock operation when the secretary determines that the potential for a discharge exists, that an owner, operator, or liability fund capable of performing the corrective actions either cannot be identified, refuses or is unable to undertake corrective actions, and that corrective action must be undertaken to protect against an imminent threat to the public health, safety, welfare, or environment of the state.
Source: SL 1998, ch 216, § 6.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in South Dakota?
Find a South Dakota lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.