S.D. Codified Laws § 46A-1-92

This is the official text of S.D. Codified Laws § 46A-1-92, part of South Dakota’s Codified Laws — part of the compiled statutory law of South Dakota, published by the state as "Codified Laws." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Legislative findings and authorization of certain water development projects

Official statutory text

The Legislature finds that it is in the best interests of South Dakota to further the development of those water projects identified in the state water resources management system and consolidated water facilities plan, consistent with the goals established in § 46A-2-2 . The Legislature further finds that pursuant to §§ 46A-1-11 to 46A-1-13 , inclusive, the Board of Water and Natural Resources has reviewed the feasibility studies, costs and benefits of certain water development projects and found it to be in the best interest of South Dakota that they receive legislative authorization. Among those projects recognized by the board are Mid-Dakota Rural Water System pursuant to resolution 91-41, Mni Wiconi Rural Water System pursuant to resolution 91-42, Lake Andes-Wagner/Marty II Irrigation Projects pursuant to resolution 91-43, Sioux Falls Flood Control Project pursuant to resolution 91-45, Black Hills Hydrology Study pursuant to resolution 91-46 and James River Improvement Project pursuant to 91-47. Therefore, the Legislature finds it is in the best interest of South Dakota to provide legislative authorization of these projects as provided in § 46A-1-11 .

Source: SL 1992, ch 254, § 7.

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in South Dakota?

Find a South Dakota lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.