Tex. Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 81.008
This is the official text of Tex. Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 81.008, part of Texas’s Civil Practice and Remedies Code — sets procedural rules and available remedies for civil lawsuits.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
§ 81.008. ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE.
Official statutory text
(a) In an action for sexual exploitation, evidence of the plaintiff's sexual history and reputation is not admissible unless:
(1) the plaintiff claims damage to sexual functioning; or
(2)(A) the defendant requests a hearing before trial and makes an offer of proof of the relevancy of the history or reputation; and
(B) the court finds that the history or reputation is relevant and that the probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect.
(b) The court may allow the admission only of specific information or examples of the plaintiff's conduct that are determined by the court to be relevant. The court's order shall detail the information or conduct that is admissible and no other such evidence may be introduced.
(1) the plaintiff claims damage to sexual functioning; or
(2)(A) the defendant requests a hearing before trial and makes an offer of proof of the relevancy of the history or reputation; and
(B) the court finds that the history or reputation is relevant and that the probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect.
(b) The court may allow the admission only of specific information or examples of the plaintiff's conduct that are determined by the court to be relevant. The court's order shall detail the information or conduct that is admissible and no other such evidence may be introduced.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Texas?
Find a Texas lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.