Matthew W. Stanley Lawyer Reviews & Ratings - Tacoma
Matthew W. Stanley is a administrative attorney based in Tacoma, Washington. Licensed to practice law in Tacoma, Matthew W. Stanley specializes in law. Located in Washington and serving clients in King County and around surrounding areas including ZIP code 98407.
Finding the right administrative attorney in Tacoma is important. Matthew W. Stanley practices at The Law Offices of Matthew W. Stanley and serves clients throughout Washington.
Total Reviews 2
Review : 1
Very trustworthy. Matthew made my stressful situation a tolerable one. His knowledge, expertise and calming effect made my experience top notch.
... more reviews
Matthew W. Stanley
Counties King County
98407 Washington State lawyer US (253) 620-6437
Are you Matthew W. Stanley or Client ? Claim this listing or Submit a review
Save Lawyer to Mylawbamba
Quick Summary Information for lawyer Matthew W. Stanley on Lawbamba
- Free or Complimentary consultation may be available for a few hours.
- Tacoma Lawyers Fees is generally in the range of $300-$500 per hour.
Compare Matthew W. Stanley's Avvo and Yelp Reviews wth other lawyers in zip 98407
Administrative lawyers
How Can I Contact Lawyer Matthew W. Stanley for Legal Advice?
Here are a few tips to break the ice once you have chosen your lawyers:
- How many years have you been in practice?
- How many Administrative similair cases like mine have you handled?
- How often do you settle Administrative cases out of court?
- What is your fees and the estimated cost of my specific case?
- Does lawyer Matthew W. Stanley offer any Pro bono services?
- What are my next steps to proceed?
Explore more Administrative Lawyers in ZIP Codes Nearby 98407
Eureka, California (ZIP 95501) - 455.3 miles away
Which Lawyers in Tacoma are similair to Matthew W. Stanley?
Daniel Frohlich
Reviews
Long story short Mr Frohlich is lazy. We asked him to reach out about a settlement. He didn’t a ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Trevor White
Reviews
Ditto review by anonymous, August 7, 2022. Worst ever. Argumentative, seems inexperienced in the sub ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Patrick Manza
Reviews
Nist handling my claim). I think he is too comfortable making too much money off of people doing a ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Tami Schack
Reviews
Other side’s arguments when you can simply sit there, looking blank, and still charge a large fee? ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Jane Melby
Reviews
I have her now, I'll let you know how it goes. were set for trial. If I don't reply.....very bad new ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
John Neeb
Reviews
O practice law. John Neeb is a sad symbol of the low bar we set for prosecutors in Washington state. ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Craig Kibbe
Reviews
N whom is in need of representation .The courts should not be able to conduct court proceeding unles ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Michael Kawamura
Reviews
Promised that there would be two other attorneys and an investigator on the case, and that as a lie. ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Judson Gray
Reviews
Finally gave up and moved on. Months later, I was emailed to inform me that, because I hadn't respon ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.80/5