California Lawyers - Los angeles

Explore California attorneys like Kate Schneider Gold, Katessa Charles, Katherine A. Carey, Katherine Auchincloss Tatikian, Katherine Bell, Katherine Blair, Katherine Dugdale, and Katherine W. Kehr. in cities like Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Los Angeles and Los Angeles. These attorneys specialize in in Zip codes like 90067, 90071, 90025.

Kate Schneider

Katherine Huan

Katherine Trax

Katherine Robe

Katherine Pipe

Katherine Mcke

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

Kate Schneider Gold

1999 Avenue of the Stars 1700 , Los Angeles , California 90067

Practice Areas: General Practice

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

Katherine Huang

Firm: Munger Tolles & Olson

355 South Grand Avenue 35th Floor , Los Angeles , California 90071

Practice Areas: Civil , Litigation, Litigation, Litigation, Litigation

Avvo Review

“Katherine is highly intelligent, sophisticated and strategic. I have all confidence in her services”

Read on Avvo

View Profile

Katherine Traxler

Firm: Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP

515 South Flower Street , Los Angeles , California 90071

Practice Areas: Bankruptcy & Debt

View Profile

Katherine Roberts

Firm: Sidley Austin LLP

350 S Grand Ave , Los Angeles , California 90071

Practice Areas: Employment & Labor

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

Katherine Piper

Firm: Kirkland & Ellis LLP A LAW FIRM SERVING GLOBAL CLIENTS

777 South Figueroa Street , Los Angeles , California 90017

Practice Areas: Bankruptcy, Litigation

View Profile

Katherine Mckeon

Firm: Sacks, Glazier, Franklin & Lodise LLP

350 S Grand Ave Ste 3500 , Los Angeles , California 90071

Practice Areas: Litigation

Katherine G. McKeon, Associate at Sacks, Glazier, Franklin & Lodise, represents trustees, beneficiaries, institutional clients and individuals in trusts and estates litigation and probate disputes.. Ms. McKeon received her J.D., cum laude from the University of Michigan Law School in 2009, where she was a Contributing Editor of the Michigan Law Review and an Associate Editor of the Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review.. Prior to joining Sacks, Glazier, Franklin & Lodise, Ms. McKeon was a litigation associate at Irell & Manella LLP, where she handled complex commercial litigation and patent litigation matters in a variety of state and federal courts.

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

Katherine L. McDaniel

Howard Hughes Center 6060 Center Drive Tenth Flo , Los Angeles , California 90045

Practice Areas: Intellectual Property

View Profile

Katherine Ku

Firm: Munger Tolles & Olson

355 South Grand Avenue 35th Floor , Los Angeles , California 90071

Practice Areas: Corporate & Incorporation

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

Katherine Kraus

Firm: Irell & Manella

1800 Avenue of the Stars , Los Angeles , California 90067

Practice Areas: Taxation - State & Federal, Tax

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

Katherine Hertel

Firm: Alston & Bird, LLP

333 S Hope St, 16th Fl. , Los Angeles , California 90071

Practice Areas: General Practice, Litigation, Litigation

Lawyers.com Review

“Kate is the kind of lawyer who listens attentively and is truly interested in finding the best solution for the client. I strongly endorse Kate.”

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

Katessa Charles

Firm: Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart

400 South Hope Street Suite 1200 , Los Angeles , California 90071

Practice Areas: General Practice, Employment & Labor, Employment & Labor, Employment & Labor, Employment & Labor, Employment & Labor

Lawyers.com Review

“I endorse this lawyer.”

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

Katherine Harvey-Lee

Firm: California Truck Law PC

453 South Spring Street , Los Angeles , California 90013

Practice Areas: Trucking Accident

A California native, Kate Harvey-Lee loves the Golden State. She was raised in the small town of Susanville in Lassen County. Her father, Judge Harvey, was a civil rights lawyer in the 1960’s and principle author of the California Evidence Code – a bedrock for every trial lawyer in California. He was later elected judge of Lassen County. Building on her father's legacy, Kate established a reputation for excellence fighting for justice at some of California’s most prestigious law firms. With her extensive breadth of experience, Kate has now focused her legal practice cases involving truck and commercial vehicle accidents.. Kate Harvey-Lee is board certified by the National Board of Trial Advocacy in Truck Accident Law. She sits on the Executive Board for the Academy of Truck Accident Attorneys – a nationwide association of some of the most experienced and knowledgeable truck wreck attorneys. Whether by trial, settlement, or arbitration, Kate has recovered millions of dollars on behalf of her clients. She is proud to have served as a compassionate counselor and determined advocate for her clients during some of the most difficult times of their lives.

Avvo Review

“, presenting evidence that required considerable time and effort to obtain. The document had a power”

Read on Avvo

Lawyers.com Review

“I endorse this lawyer.”

View Profile

Katherine Hardy

Firm: County of Los Angeles County Counsel

500 W Temple St # 6 , Los Angeles , California 90012

Practice Areas: Litigation, Employment, Intellectual Property

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

Katherine Forster

Firm: Munger Tolles & Olson LLP

350 S Grand Ave Fl 50 , Los Angeles , California 90071

Practice Areas: Civil , Labor , Class Action, Class Action

View Profile

Katherine Dugdale

Firm: Perkins Coie LLP

1888 Century Park E Ste 1700 , Los Angeles , California 90067

Practice Areas: Intellectual Property, Litigation, Trademark

View Profile

Katherine Blair

Firm: K&L Gates

10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 7th Floor , Los Angeles , California 90067

Practice Areas: Business

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

Katherine Bell

Firm: Paul Hastings

515 South Flower Street , Los Angeles , California 90071

Practice Areas: Corporate , Financial Markets and Services, Financial Markets and Services

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

Katherine A. Carey

1240 515 South Figueroa Street Californi , Los Angeles , California 90071

Practice Areas: Banking & Finance,Consumer Protection,Corporate ,Land Use & Zoning,Municipal ,Real Estate

Google Review

“Kathrine was beyond amazing! She exceeded all my expectations. I was referred to her by dear friend. She negotiated the deal for me. She settled my case without going into fights i…”

— Kristina Ogneva

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

Katherine W. Kehr

Firm: Selman, Breitman LLP

11766 Wilshire Boulevard Sixth Floor Californi , Los Angeles , California 90025

Practice Areas: Insurance

View Profile

Lawyers Rating:

Katherine Auchincloss Tatikian

Firm: Citron & Citron

11845 W Olympic Blvd , Los Angeles , California 90064

Practice Areas: Insurance Coverage, Litigation and Appeals, Defense of Personal Injury, Products Liability, Premises Liability, Foster Care, Business Litigation Cases, Defense of Complex and Class Action Cases, Appellate Practice, Defense and Appeals of Lawsuit Against Transportation and Common Carrier Defendants

Describe Your Case — We'll Connect You With a Matching Lawyer

Practice area *

Zip code

Your name *

Email address *

Phone (optional)

Describe your case *

By submitting, you agree to Lawbamba's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Submitting a case description does not create an attorney–client relationship and is not confidential.

Save This Search

Recent Q&As in California

Is my company discriminating against pregnant women? (CA, USA) | Aug 25, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: California, USA Hi all, in the state of California, you are considered disabled at 36 weeks of pregnancy. I had an approved disability claim with the state of California with paperwork from my doctor stating my disabling condition was pregnancy. I filed paperwork with my work for a pregnancy disability claim and twice they denied my short term disability leave stating “being 36 weeks pregnant is not sufficient information. your doctor must provide specific information as to why you cannot work”. To get the documentation exactly how they wanted I would need to schedule an appointment and tell my doctor what to write on the form which didn’t seem right to me either. Going back and forth and going to my doctor was frankly exhausting especially when the baby was expected any day at that point so I told them to forget it and I would take unpaid pregnancy leave. I find it seriously legally questionable that the state of California could find me disabled but my work (or rather the 3rd party representing my work) said I was not disabled and refused my claim. I spoke to other women and they experienced the same. They were not paid disability until the baby was born. Are pregnant women being denied disability illegally? or is this something my work is able to do? I live and work in California, the other women I asked live and work in California. Thank you in advance.
California payroll issue: missed paycheck, $2,000 Zelle, and incorrect final paystub — what should I do? | Aug 24, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
I recently left my MDS LVN position at a SNF due to management is really bad and I feel sorry for the resident that is currently admitted. My agreed rate was $52/hr. Payroll schedule was 1st–15th paid on the 25th, and 16th–end of month paid on the 10th. I worked 40 hours from 7/27–7/31. My iSolved account wasn’t set up correctly, so I completed a paper timecard and gave it to the facility administrator. The administrator was the person responsible for entering my hours into iSolved. Those July 27–31 hours should have been paid on 8/10, but I received no paycheck. On 8/3, I reported COVID exposure, worked about 3 hours, was sent home, then tested positive. I did not work [8/4–8/12](tel:8/4-8/12) while isolating unpaid since I’m new. After following up about the missing 8/10 paycheck, I spoke with my administrator demanding my check so my administrator sent me $2,000 via personal Zelle on 8/13 as advanced since he admitted that he deaden a mistake and did not process my hours. No paystub was provided for the Zelle payment. At the time I understood it to be connected to the missed payroll. Now that I’ve left, he was asking me for the $2,000 back and he says it was his personal money to help me with rent. I dispute that characterization and I also have the texts/Zelle record that indicated that money was sent to cover his mistakes from the corporate HR but he did not expect that I would…
21, first job in California employer made this 2-year non-compete a condition of employment. Is this legal? | Aug 23, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: California I’m 21 and this is my first job in California. When I was given my employment contract, I was also given this separate non-compete agreement and told it was part of what I needed to sign for the job. I’ve heard they are illegal now. For more context,I’m an hourly, at-will employee in a real estate/property-management support role. I’m fine with reasonable confidentiality and trade-secret protections, but this seems extremely broad. Is this legal in California? And what rights do I have if signing this was made a condition of employment? Should I just sign and deal with it later? NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT This Non-Compete Agreement (this “AGREEMENT”) is made _________ by and between [COMPANY], (the “COMPANY”) and [EMPLOYEE] (the “EMPLOYEE”). WHEREAS, the parties hereto recognize and agree that the services of the Employee are special and unique and that he/she has special fiduciary duties to the Company as an Employee; WHEREAS, for the foregoing reasons, a covenant on the part of the Employee not to compete during his employment and for a reasonable period after the termination or expiration of his/her employment is essential to protect the business of the Company; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by the Company and the Employee as follows: 1. NON-COMPETE. During the period of the time that the Employee is employed by the Company and for a period of two (2) years after the termination or cessation of employment for any reason (both periods of time, taken together, being referred to…
Divorce Help | Aug 23, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: New York and California Hello, I’m not sure if this is the right place to post this, but I don’t know much about this and need help. For context, this is in regard to my parents’ situation. My mom, 56, and my dad, 55, are currently separated just locationally. My mom currently resides in California, and my dad in New York. I (M22) live in New York but not with my dad; no one knows where he lives, but we know he’s in New York. My two brothers (M23, M19) live in California with my mom. My mom is now trying to divorce my dad as soon as possible, but she’s from Korea and even though she’s lived here for half her life she still doesn’t know too much about certain things and her English speaking and understanding isn’t 100% so stuff like this proves difficult. Thus, she’s letting my dad take the reigns of everything and just asking him to file and fill her in, but he keeps delaying and manipulating her. I’m not too sure of all the details of their conversations, but I know he’s been hiding things and delaying things. My question is: it’d be better if we served him papers and commenced everything, but how would we if we don’t know where he lives? Also, both my parents can’t really afford lawyers so we would want to do it as smoothly and least costly as possible. If anyone has any advice please let me…
California assault at work left me with permanent eye damage. Personal injury attorneys say workers’ comp, workers’ comp attorneys say personal injury. What kind of attorney do | Aug 23, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
I’m in Los Angeles County, California, and I’m hoping someone can point me in the right direction because I keep getting bounced between personal injury and workers’ compensation attorneys. On October 6, 2025, I was training one of my clients inside a gym where I work as an independent personal trainer. Another trainer started causing trouble with another client of mine. I attempted to de-escalate the situation, but he quickly became violent, threatened to kill my family and me, and pushed forward on me with a crazed look in his eyes. At that point, another member and I restrained him on the ground while I yelled for the gathering crowd of members and gym employees to call the police. There were ample witnesses to the threats. Other trainers kept telling me to let him up. I told them why I was holding him until the police arrived, but I eventually released him because they kept insisting I let him go. After I let him go, he was not secured by the gym employees or kept away from me. When I turned back toward my client, he came up from behind me and violently struck me in the right temple and eye. I suffered an orbital fracture, immediate loss of vision in my right eye, loss of hearing, and a severe concussion. My client had to fend off the attacking trainer as he attempted to continually strike me while I was in shock. I now have permanent vertical double vision, a…

See more Q&A Ask a Lawyer (free)

Previous 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 Next

Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.