Consumer Protection lawyers in Idaho

Explore Idaho Consumer Protection attorneys like Barkley Smith, Benjamin Schwartzman, Bonner Walsh, Mitchell Barker and Stephen Thomas in Boise and Grangeville (ZIP codes 83709, 83702, 83530).

View Profile

№ 1 Consumer Protection Idaho

Avvo Rating:

Bonner Walsh

Firm: Walsh PLLC

1561 Long Haul Rd , Grangeville , Idaho 83530

Practice Areas: Consumer Protection

Avvo Review

“…and has had an engine replacement done prior. I would explain my situation fully but this would be a…”

Read on Avvo

Lawyers.com Review

“Bonner Walsh is a very professional and experienced attorney, and I've greatly enjoyed the opportunity to work with him. He has always proven to be knowledgeable and responsive.”

View Profile

Barkley Smith

, Boise , Idaho 83709

Practice Areas: Consumer Protection

Lawyers.com Review

“Barkley Smith is experienced, intelligent, and aggressive and knows his stuff when it comes to suing debt collectors, credit bureaus, and protecting victims of Identity Theft!”

View Profile

Benjamin Schwartzman

Firm: Andersen Banducci PLLC

101 S Capitol Blvd Ste 1600 , Boise , Idaho 83702

Practice Areas: Class Actions, Consumer Protection, Corporate, Employment & Labor, Securities, Litigation

View Profile

Mitchell Barker

Firm: Barker Law Offices, Lc

3501 W Elder St Ste 110 , Boise , Idaho 83705

Practice Areas: Administrative, Adoption, Animal Bites, Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Arbitration & Mediation, Assault & Battery, Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy, Business & Commercial, Business Organizations, Child Custody & Visitation, Child Support, Civil Rights, Communications & Media, Condemnation & Eminent Domain, Constitutional, Construction, Consumer Protection, Contracts, Criminal Defense, Debtor/Creditor, Discrimination, Divorce, Education, Election Campaign & Political, Employment & Labor, Entertainment & Sports, Environmental, Estate Planning, Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Family, Government Agencies, Government Contracts, Health Care & Hospitalization, Housing & Construction Defects, Insurance, Intellectual Property, Labor, Land Use & Zoning, Landlord & Tenant, Legal Malpractice, Lemon, Medical Malpractice, Motor Vehicle Accidents, Motor Vehicle Defects, Personal Injury, Premises Liability, Probate, Products Liability, Professional Malpractice, Real Estate, Securities, Sexual Harassment, Toxic Substances, Traffic Violations, Trusts, Wills, Workers Compensation, Wrongful Death

View Profile

Stephen Thomas

Firm: Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley, LLP

Po Box 1617 , Boise , Idaho 83701

Practice Areas: Asbestos, Aviation & Aerospace, Business & Commercial, Business Organizations, Construction, Consumer Protection, Contracts, Drugs & Medical Devices, Election Campaign & Political, Employment & Labor, Energy, Gaming, Housing & Construction Defects, Insurance, Land Use & Zoning, Lemon, Motor Vehicle Defects, Natural Resources, Products Liability, Real Estate, Securities, Toxic Substances, Transportation

Describe Your Case — We'll Connect You With a Matching Lawyer

Save This Search

Recent Q&As in Idaho (Consumer Protection)

Horse Buying Contract | Oct 28, 2026 | Sourced from the original Reddit post
This is absurd. Bear with me. So basically in July I put down a deposit on a weanling horse, to be picked up October 30th. The horse was advertised as "buckskin with color panel testing." Because they were a professional breeder with a social media presence I didn't believe they could POSSIBLY fuck this up. It never even occurred to me that a reputable breeder could misread a color panel test. They talked about other results on the color panel (LP, PATN1) so I wasn't pressed about the others and didn't ask for a picture of the results. Two months later I asked about the A and E genes to double check and they revealed the horse doesn't have the agouti gene... meaning she is not buckskin as advertised. The breeders response was: this is impossible, she is buckskin, the tests are wrong. She said she'd retest and... the can proceeded to get kicked down the road, every time a payment came up and I asked about the results she assured me that without a doubt she would be buckskin. Well, the results are finally back two payments and several weeks later... and shocker, she is 'aa', meaning she possesses no agouti and is not buckskin. Her response was not heartening and took no responsibility and basically avoided directly admitting that she misread the color panel test and falsely advertised her in July. She gave me some options that all involved me absorbing the loss (she resells for me and…

See more Q&A Ask a Lawyer (free)

You have reached the Last Page!

Disclaimer: This content is based on public information and user submissions. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.