Cal. COM § 9306.2
This is the official text of Cal. COM § 9306.2, part of California’s Commercial Code — california's version of the Uniform Commercial Code, governing sales, negotiable instruments, and secured transactions.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Official statutory text
(a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), the local law of the controllable electronic record’s jurisdiction specified in subdivisions (c) and (d) of Section 12107 governs perfection, the effect of perfection or nonperfection, and the priority of a security interest in a controllable electronic record and a security interest in a controllable account or controllable payment intangible evidenced by the controllable electronic record.
(b) The local law of the jurisdiction in which the debtor is located governs both of the following:
(1) Perfection of a security interest in a controllable account, controllable electronic record, or controllable payment intangible by filing.
(2) Automatic perfection of a security interest in a controllable payment intangible created by a sale of the controllable payment intangible.
(b) The local law of the jurisdiction in which the debtor is located governs both of the following:
(1) Perfection of a security interest in a controllable account, controllable electronic record, or controllable payment intangible by filing.
(2) Automatic perfection of a security interest in a controllable payment intangible created by a sale of the controllable payment intangible.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Dealing with a business matter in California?
See all California Business lawyers
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.