Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-107c
This is the official text of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-107c, part of Connecticut’s Gen. Stat — part of the compiled statutory law of Connecticut, published by the state as "Gen. Stat." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Sec. 12-107c. Classification of land as farm land.
Official statutory text
(b) An application for classification of land as farm land shall be made upon a form prescribed by the Commissioner of Agriculture and shall set forth a description of the land, a general description of the use to which it is being put, a statement of the potential liability for tax under the provisions of sections 12-504a to 12-504f , inclusive, and such other information as the assessor may require to aid the assessor in determining whether such land qualifies for such classification.
(c) Failure to file an application for classification of land as farm land within the time limit prescribed in subsection (a) and in the manner and form prescribed in subsection (b) shall be considered a waiver of the right to such classification on such assessment list.
(d) Any person aggrieved by the denial of any application for the classification of land as farm land shall have the same rights and remedies for appeal and relief as are provided in the general statutes for taxpayers claiming to be aggrieved by the doings of assessors or boards of assessment appeals.
See Sec. 12-63 re rule of valuation.
When owner applied under section for classification of land as farm land, criteria to be applied is actual use of land and it was reversible error for court to predicate classification on its highest and best use. 156 C. 107. Since plaintiffs had not applied for classification of their land as farm land under section, town assessors correctly valued their farm at its fair market value. Id., 437. Cited. 160 C. 71; 168 C. 319; 173 C. 328; 174 C. 10; 178 C. 100; 199 C. 294; 241 C. 382.
Cited. 3 CA 53.
A wooded area, detached from parcels of land used for farming, not within statutory definition of farm land; land used for loam and gravel business does not qualify as farm land. 26 CS 162. That plaintiff's major income was from a nonfarming operation on one parcel of land did not, ipso facto, deprive two other parcels of their status as farm land. Id., 163. Where plaintiff had brought a timely appeal under Sec. 12-118 which was nonsuited, he is not entitled to rely on Sec. 52-592 to bring a new appeal on the same course of action after the 2-month limitation had run, since the proceeding, involving an appeal under this section, is not the type of action which comes within the saving protection of Sec. 52-592. Id., 168. Capitalization of rentals is best method of assessment under section. 28 CS 97.
(c) Failure to file an application for classification of land as farm land within the time limit prescribed in subsection (a) and in the manner and form prescribed in subsection (b) shall be considered a waiver of the right to such classification on such assessment list.
(d) Any person aggrieved by the denial of any application for the classification of land as farm land shall have the same rights and remedies for appeal and relief as are provided in the general statutes for taxpayers claiming to be aggrieved by the doings of assessors or boards of assessment appeals.
See Sec. 12-63 re rule of valuation.
When owner applied under section for classification of land as farm land, criteria to be applied is actual use of land and it was reversible error for court to predicate classification on its highest and best use. 156 C. 107. Since plaintiffs had not applied for classification of their land as farm land under section, town assessors correctly valued their farm at its fair market value. Id., 437. Cited. 160 C. 71; 168 C. 319; 173 C. 328; 174 C. 10; 178 C. 100; 199 C. 294; 241 C. 382.
Cited. 3 CA 53.
A wooded area, detached from parcels of land used for farming, not within statutory definition of farm land; land used for loam and gravel business does not qualify as farm land. 26 CS 162. That plaintiff's major income was from a nonfarming operation on one parcel of land did not, ipso facto, deprive two other parcels of their status as farm land. Id., 163. Where plaintiff had brought a timely appeal under Sec. 12-118 which was nonsuited, he is not entitled to rely on Sec. 52-592 to bring a new appeal on the same course of action after the 2-month limitation had run, since the proceeding, involving an appeal under this section, is not the type of action which comes within the saving protection of Sec. 52-592. Id., 168. Capitalization of rentals is best method of assessment under section. 28 CS 97.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Connecticut?
Find a Connecticut lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.