Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-3c

(b) The zoning commission or combined planning and zoning commission of any municipality shall hold a public hearing on an application or request for a special permit or special exception, as provided in section 8-2 , and on an application for a special exemption under section 8-2g . Such hearing shall be held in accordance with the provisions of section 8-7d . The commission shall not render a decision on the application until the inland wetlands agency has submitted a report with its final decision to such commission. In making its decision the zoning commission shall give due consideration to the report of the inland wetlands agency. Such commission shall decide upon such application or request within the period of time permitted under section 8-7d . Whenever a commission grants or denies a special permit or special exception, it shall state upon its records the reason for its decision. Notice of the decision of the commission shall be published in a newspaper having a substantial circulation in the municipality and addressed by certified mail to the person who requested or applied for a special permit or special exception, by its secretary or clerk, under his signature in any written, printed, typewritten or stamped form, within fifteen days after such decision has been rendered. In any case in which such notice is not published within such fifteen-day period, the person who requested or applied for such special permit or special exception may provide for the publication of such notice within ten days thereafter. Such permit or exception shall become effective upon the filing of a copy thereof (1) in the office of the town, city or borough clerk, as the case may be, but, in the case of a district, in the offices of both the district clerk and the town clerk of the town in which such district is located, and (2) in the land records of the town in which the affected premises are located, in accordance with the provisions of section 8-3d .

(c) (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a) and (b) of this section, any special permit or special exception approval made under this section prior to July 1, 2011, that has not expired prior to July 12, 2021, and that specified a deadline by which all work in connection with such approval is required to be completed, shall expire not less than nineteen years after the date of such approval and the commission may grant one or more extensions of time to complete all or part of the work in connection with such special permit or special exception.

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a) and (b) of this section, any special permit or special exception approval made under this section on or after July 1, 2011, but prior to June 10, 2021, that did not expire prior to March 10, 2020, and that specified a deadline by which all work in connection with such approval is required to be completed, shall expire not less than nineteen years after the date of such approval and the commission may grant one or more extensions of time to complete all or part of the work in connection with such special permit or special exception.

Cited. 206 C. 554; 218 C. 65. When approval for site plan and special exception are separate actions, provisions re statutory timelines do not apply. 253 C. 195.

Cited. 5 CA 455; 7 CA 684; 18 CA 85; 24 CA 163; 29 CA 1; 38 CA 171; 41 CA 89; 45 CA 89.

Cited. 42 CS 256.

Subsec. (b):

Cited. 213 C. 604; 220 C. 455; 224 C. 924; 227 C. 799.
n connection with such special permit or special exception.

Cited. 206 C. 554; 218 C. 65. When approval for site plan and special exception are separate actions, provisions re statutory timelines do not apply. 253 C. 195.

Cited. 5 CA 455; 7 CA 684; 18 CA 85; 24 CA 163; 29 CA 1; 38 CA 171; 41 CA 89; 45 CA 89.

Cited. 42 CS 256.

Subsec. (b):

Cited. 213 C. 604; 220 C. 455; 224 C. 924; 227 C. 799.

Cited. 20 CA 705; 29 CA 469; 30 CA 395; judgment reversed, see 230 C. 452. Trial court properly determined that failure of planning and zoning commission to comply with statutory notice and hearing requirements entitled individual plaintiffs to automatic approval of their application for special permit and site plan approval; notice of commission hearing was invalid and because failure to give proper notice was a jurisdictional defect, action of commission in denying plaintiffs' application was void. 52 CA 763. 15-day notice requirement is substantive, not a matter of procedure or convenience. 55 CA 359.