D.C. Code § 8-115.07
This is the official text of D.C. Code § 8-115.07, part of District of Columbia’s Code — part of the compiled statutory law of District of Columbia, published by the state as "Code." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
§ 8-115.07. Permit requirements.
Official statutory text
(a) Prior to conducting a lead-based paint abatement as defined in § 8-115.01(1)(A) [repealed], business entities and individuals shall obtain a permit from the Mayor. To obtain a permit, an application shall be submitted to the Mayor for approval with the appropriate fee. The application shall contain the following information:
(1) The location of the lead-based paint abatement project;
(2) The starting and completion dates of the lead-based paint abatement;
(3) The approximate amount of lead-based paint or lead-based paint containing materials to be abated;
(4) The method of abatement to be employed;
(5) The provisions for medical surveillance and worker protection;
(6) The manner in which the waste containing lead will be disposed and location of the disposal site;
(7) A description of the areas immediately adjacent to the abatement site;
(8) Proof of certification, pursuant to § 8-115.05 , of the business entity and of all individuals who will be engaging in the lead-based paint abatement; and
(9) Any other information required by the Mayor through the formal rulemaking and regulatory process of § 8-115.14 .
(b) A permit fee determined by the Mayor shall be assessed for each lead-based paint abatement project. The Mayor may by rulemaking revise permit fees as necessary to recover the costs of administering and enforcing this subchapter. Permits shall be valid for a period not to exceed one year from the date of issuance. Each permit shall be limited to one site and shall not be transferable to another site.
(c) A single application and permit shall be sufficient for an entire abatement project. Separate permits for each unit or building are not required as long as the units and buildings are located on the same real property.
(1) The location of the lead-based paint abatement project;
(2) The starting and completion dates of the lead-based paint abatement;
(3) The approximate amount of lead-based paint or lead-based paint containing materials to be abated;
(4) The method of abatement to be employed;
(5) The provisions for medical surveillance and worker protection;
(6) The manner in which the waste containing lead will be disposed and location of the disposal site;
(7) A description of the areas immediately adjacent to the abatement site;
(8) Proof of certification, pursuant to § 8-115.05 , of the business entity and of all individuals who will be engaging in the lead-based paint abatement; and
(9) Any other information required by the Mayor through the formal rulemaking and regulatory process of § 8-115.14 .
(b) A permit fee determined by the Mayor shall be assessed for each lead-based paint abatement project. The Mayor may by rulemaking revise permit fees as necessary to recover the costs of administering and enforcing this subchapter. Permits shall be valid for a period not to exceed one year from the date of issuance. Each permit shall be limited to one site and shall not be transferable to another site.
(c) A single application and permit shall be sufficient for an entire abatement project. Separate permits for each unit or building are not required as long as the units and buildings are located on the same real property.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in District of Columbia?
Find a District of Columbia lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.