Haw. Rev. Stat. § 78-2.6

This is the official text of Haw. Rev. Stat. § 78-2.6, part of Hawaii’s Rev. Stat — part of the compiled statutory law of Hawaii, published by the state as "Rev. Stat." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Prospective employees; suitability for public employment.

Official statutory text

All prospective employees, regardless of the positions they will assume, shall demonstrate their suitability for public employment by:

(1) Passing a pre-employment controlled substance drug test if required by the employing jurisdiction; and

(2) Attesting that during the three-year period immediately preceding the date of application for employment, the person was not convicted of any controlled-substance-related offense.

If an applicant fails to meet the suitability requirements of the employing jurisdiction, the applicant shall be disqualified from further employment consideration or deemed ineligible for appointment under section 76-29 on the basis of unsuitability for public employment.

Notwithstanding paragraph (2), for positions described in section 76-16(b)(13)(C), an applicant shall not be automatically disqualified from employment based on a controlled-substance-related offense, provided that reasonable safeguards are in place to protect employees and the public. [L 2000, c 253, pt of §74; am L 2013, c 30, §2]]

Revision Note

Subsection designation deleted pursuant to §23G-15(1).

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in Hawaii?

Find a Hawaii lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.