38 M.R.S. § 962-B

This is the official text of 38 M.R.S. § 962-B, part of Maine’s M.R.S — part of the compiled statutory law of Maine, published by the state as "M.R.S." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

38 §962-B. Amendments to district boundaries and performance standards

Official statutory text

The commission may initiate, and any municipal agency, an organization qualified under section 966‑A or any property owner or lessee may petition for a change in the boundary of any land use district or for amendments to any additional performance standard adopted pursuant to section 962‑A . [PL 1979, c. 459, §1 (NEW).]

No change in a district boundary shall be approved unless substantial evidence shows that the area is better suited for uses other than those permitted in the district in which it is situated, or changes in conditions have made the present classification unreasonable. [PL 1979, c. 459, §1 (NEW).]

No amendment to performance standards shall be approved unless substantial evidence shows that: [PL 1979, c. 459, §1 (NEW).]

1. Conditions not in evidence. Conditions exist which were not evident when the performance standard was adopted; [PL 1979, c. 459, §1 (NEW).]

2. Purpose not served. The performance standard does not serve the purpose of this chapter; or [PL 1979, c. 459, §1 (NEW).]

3. Amendment preferable. The amendment would better fulfill the purpose of this chapter. [PL 1979, c. 459, §1 (NEW).]

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in Maine?

Find a Maine lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.