Internal prototype — noindexed, not linked from public navigation yet.

Md. Code, Commercial Law § 12-119

This is the official text of Md. Code, Commercial Law § 12-119, part of Maryland’s Code, Commercial Law — governs commercial transactions - Maryland's version of the Uniform Commercial Code.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

§12–119.

Official statutory text

(a) This section applies to any application for a loan, other than a commercial loan, to be secured by a first mortgage or first deed of trust on a borrower's primary residence.

(b) Any lender that imposes fees on borrowers for settlement services, or document review services, performed by a lender-designated attorney, or who conditions settlement on the employment of a particular attorney or title insurance company under § 12-120(c) of this subtitle, shall provide a prospective borrower with a written notice stating:

(1) The lender’s requirements concerning selection of an attorney, title insurance company, or other person to perform settlement services relating to the purchase of the real property;

(2) The borrower’s ability to choose an attorney or title insurance company under § 12-120(c) of this subtitle; and

(3) A good faith estimate of the fee or fees to be charged to the borrower.

(c) If notice is required by this section:

(1) The notice shall be provided at the time of or within 3 days after the application for a loan, or earlier upon request; and

(2) A copy of the notice, signed by the applicant, shall accompany any executed application for a loan.

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.