Md. Code, Courts and Judicial Proceedings § 3-2003
This is the official text of Md. Code, Courts and Judicial Proceedings § 3-2003, part of Maryland’s Code, Courts and Judicial Proceedings — governs court structure and civil procedure.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
§3–2003.
Official statutory text
(a) A collaborative law process begins when the parties sign a collaborative law participation agreement.
(b) A tribunal may not order a party to participate in a collaborative law process over that party’s objection.
(c) A collaborative law process is concluded by:
(1) A resolution of a collaborative matter as evidenced by a signed record;
(2) A resolution of a part of the collaborative matter, evidenced by a signed record, in which the parties agree that the remaining parts of the matter will not be resolved in the process; or
(3) A termination of the process.
(d) A collaborative law process terminates:
(1) When a party gives notice to other parties in a record that the process is ended;
(2) When a party:
(i) Begins a proceeding related to a collaborative matter without the agreement of all parties; or
(ii) In a pending proceeding related to the matter:
1. Initiates a pleading, a motion, an order to show cause, or a request for a conference with the tribunal;
2. Requests that the proceeding be put on the tribunal’s calendar; or
3. Takes similar action requiring notice to be sent to the parties; or
(3) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (g) of this section, when a party discharges a collaborative lawyer or a collaborative lawyer withdraws from further representation of a party.
(e) A party’s collaborative lawyer shall give prompt notice to all other parties in a record of a discharge or withdrawal.
(f) A party may terminate a collaborative law process with or without cause.
(g) Notwithstanding the discharge or withdrawal of a collaborative lawyer, a collaborative law process continues if, within 30 days after the date that the notice of discharge or withdrawal of a collaborative lawyer required by subsection (e) of this section is sent to the parties:
(1) The unrepresented party engages a successor collaborative lawyer; and
(2) In a signed record:
(i) The parties consent to continue the process by reaffirming the collaborative law participation agreement;
(ii) The agreement is amended to identify the successor collaborative lawyer; and
(iii) The successor collaborative lawyer confirms the lawyer’s representation of a party in the collaborative process.
(h) A collaborative law process does not conclude if, with the consent of the parties, a party requests a tribunal to approve a resolution of the collaborative matter or any part of the collaborative matter as evidenced by a signed record.
(i) A collaborative law participation agreement may provide additional methods of concluding a collaborative law process.
(b) A tribunal may not order a party to participate in a collaborative law process over that party’s objection.
(c) A collaborative law process is concluded by:
(1) A resolution of a collaborative matter as evidenced by a signed record;
(2) A resolution of a part of the collaborative matter, evidenced by a signed record, in which the parties agree that the remaining parts of the matter will not be resolved in the process; or
(3) A termination of the process.
(d) A collaborative law process terminates:
(1) When a party gives notice to other parties in a record that the process is ended;
(2) When a party:
(i) Begins a proceeding related to a collaborative matter without the agreement of all parties; or
(ii) In a pending proceeding related to the matter:
1. Initiates a pleading, a motion, an order to show cause, or a request for a conference with the tribunal;
2. Requests that the proceeding be put on the tribunal’s calendar; or
3. Takes similar action requiring notice to be sent to the parties; or
(3) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (g) of this section, when a party discharges a collaborative lawyer or a collaborative lawyer withdraws from further representation of a party.
(e) A party’s collaborative lawyer shall give prompt notice to all other parties in a record of a discharge or withdrawal.
(f) A party may terminate a collaborative law process with or without cause.
(g) Notwithstanding the discharge or withdrawal of a collaborative lawyer, a collaborative law process continues if, within 30 days after the date that the notice of discharge or withdrawal of a collaborative lawyer required by subsection (e) of this section is sent to the parties:
(1) The unrepresented party engages a successor collaborative lawyer; and
(2) In a signed record:
(i) The parties consent to continue the process by reaffirming the collaborative law participation agreement;
(ii) The agreement is amended to identify the successor collaborative lawyer; and
(iii) The successor collaborative lawyer confirms the lawyer’s representation of a party in the collaborative process.
(h) A collaborative law process does not conclude if, with the consent of the parties, a party requests a tribunal to approve a resolution of the collaborative matter or any part of the collaborative matter as evidenced by a signed record.
(i) A collaborative law participation agreement may provide additional methods of concluding a collaborative law process.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Maryland?
Find a Maryland lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.