Md. Code, Insurance § 14-205.1
This is the official text of Md. Code, Insurance § 14-205.1, part of Maryland’s Code, Insurance — regulates insurance companies and the policies they sell.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
§14–205.
Official statutory text
§14–205.1.
(a) The Commissioner may authorize an insurer or nonprofit health service plan to offer a preferred provider insurance policy that conditions the payment of benefits on the use of preferred providers if the insurer or nonprofit health service plan does not restrict payment for covered services provided by nonpreferred providers:
(1) for emergency services, as defined in § 19–701 of the Health – General Article;
(2) for an unforeseen illness, injury, or condition requiring immediate care; or
(3) as required under § 15–830 of this article.
(b) (1) If an employer, association, or other private group arrangement offers health benefit plan coverage to employees or individuals only through preferred providers, then the insurer or nonprofit health service plan with which the employer, association, or other private group arrangement is contracting for the coverage shall offer an option to include preferred and nonpreferred providers as an additional benefit for an employee or individual, at the employee’s or individual’s option, to accept or reject.
(2) The insurer or nonprofit health service plan shall provide to each employer, association, or other private group arrangement a disclosure statement on the group application that an option to include preferred and nonpreferred providers is available for the individual or employee to accept or reject.
(c) An employer, association, or other private group arrangement may require an employee or individual that accepts the additional coverage for preferred and nonpreferred providers to pay a premium greater than the amount of the premium for the coverage offered for preferred providers only.
(a) The Commissioner may authorize an insurer or nonprofit health service plan to offer a preferred provider insurance policy that conditions the payment of benefits on the use of preferred providers if the insurer or nonprofit health service plan does not restrict payment for covered services provided by nonpreferred providers:
(1) for emergency services, as defined in § 19–701 of the Health – General Article;
(2) for an unforeseen illness, injury, or condition requiring immediate care; or
(3) as required under § 15–830 of this article.
(b) (1) If an employer, association, or other private group arrangement offers health benefit plan coverage to employees or individuals only through preferred providers, then the insurer or nonprofit health service plan with which the employer, association, or other private group arrangement is contracting for the coverage shall offer an option to include preferred and nonpreferred providers as an additional benefit for an employee or individual, at the employee’s or individual’s option, to accept or reject.
(2) The insurer or nonprofit health service plan shall provide to each employer, association, or other private group arrangement a disclosure statement on the group application that an option to include preferred and nonpreferred providers is available for the individual or employee to accept or reject.
(c) An employer, association, or other private group arrangement may require an employee or individual that accepts the additional coverage for preferred and nonpreferred providers to pay a premium greater than the amount of the premium for the coverage offered for preferred providers only.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Maryland?
Find a Maryland lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.