Mich. Comp. Laws § 24.306
This is the official text of Mich. Comp. Laws § 24.306, part of Michigan’s Comp. Laws — part of the compiled statutory law of Michigan, published by the state as "Comp. Laws." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Grounds for reversals.
Official statutory text
Sec. 106.
Except when a statute or the constitution provides for a different scope of review, the court shall hold unlawful and set aside a decision or order of an agency if substantial rights of the petitioner have been prejudiced because the decision or order is any of the following:
In violation of the constitution or a statute.
In excess of the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the agency.
Made upon unlawful procedure resulting in material prejudice to a party.
Not supported by competent, material and substantial evidence on the whole record.
Arbitrary, capricious or clearly an abuse or unwarranted exercise of discretion.
Affected by other substantial and material error of law.
The court, as appropriate, may affirm, reverse or modify the decision or order or remand the case for further proceedings.
History: 1969, Act 306, Eff. July 1, 1970
Except when a statute or the constitution provides for a different scope of review, the court shall hold unlawful and set aside a decision or order of an agency if substantial rights of the petitioner have been prejudiced because the decision or order is any of the following:
In violation of the constitution or a statute.
In excess of the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the agency.
Made upon unlawful procedure resulting in material prejudice to a party.
Not supported by competent, material and substantial evidence on the whole record.
Arbitrary, capricious or clearly an abuse or unwarranted exercise of discretion.
Affected by other substantial and material error of law.
The court, as appropriate, may affirm, reverse or modify the decision or order or remand the case for further proceedings.
History: 1969, Act 306, Eff. July 1, 1970
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Michigan?
Find a Michigan lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.