Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.425n

This is the official text of Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.425n, part of Michigan’s Comp. Laws — part of the compiled statutory law of Michigan, published by the state as "Comp. Laws." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Other license or permit; limitations by employer prohibited.

Official statutory text

Sec. 5n.

This state or a local unit of government of this state shall not prohibit an individual from doing either of the following as a condition for receiving or maintaining any other license or permit authorized by law:

Applying for or receiving a license to carry a concealed pistol under this act.

Carrying a concealed pistol in compliance with a license issued under this act.

Except as provided in subsection (3), an employer shall not prohibit an employee from doing either of the following:

Applying for or receiving a license to carry a concealed pistol under this act.

Carrying a concealed pistol in compliance with a license issued under this act. This subdivision does not prohibit an employer from prohibiting an employee from carrying a concealed pistol in the course of his or her employment with that employer.

A police agency may prohibit an employee of that police agency from carrying a concealed pistol if carrying a concealed pistol would result in increased insurance premiums or a loss or reduction of insurance coverage for that employer.

History: Add. 2000, Act 381, Eff. July 1, 2001

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in Michigan?

Find a Michigan lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.