Mich. Comp. Laws § 38.2655
This is the official text of Mich. Comp. Laws § 38.2655, part of Michigan’s Comp. Laws — part of the compiled statutory law of Michigan, published by the state as "Comp. Laws." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
“Employer,”“former qualified participant,” and “health benefit dependent” defined.
Official statutory text
Sec. 705.
"Employer" means this state.
"Former qualified participant" means an individual who was a qualified participant and who terminates the employment upon which his or her participation is based for any reason.
"Health benefit dependent" means the qualified or former qualified participant's spouse, if any, and an unmarried child who is considered a dependent of the qualified or former qualified participant under section 152 of the internal revenue code, if any.
History: Add. 1996, Act 523, Eff. Mar. 31, 1997; Am. 1999, Act 215, Eff. May 30, 2000
"Employer" means this state.
"Former qualified participant" means an individual who was a qualified participant and who terminates the employment upon which his or her participation is based for any reason.
"Health benefit dependent" means the qualified or former qualified participant's spouse, if any, and an unmarried child who is considered a dependent of the qualified or former qualified participant under section 152 of the internal revenue code, if any.
History: Add. 1996, Act 523, Eff. Mar. 31, 1997; Am. 1999, Act 215, Eff. May 30, 2000
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Michigan?
Find a Michigan lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.