Nev. Rev. Stat. § 34.790
This is the official text of Nev. Rev. Stat. § 34.790, part of Nevada’s Rev. Stat — part of the compiled statutory law of Nevada, published by the state as "Rev. Stat." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Record of evidentiary hearing after writ is granted; submission of additional material
Official statutory text
1. If an evidentiary hearing is required, the judge or justice may direct that the record be expanded by the parties by the inclusion of additional materials relevant to the determination of the merits of the petition.
2. The expanded record may include, without limitation, letters which predate the filing of the petition in the district court, documents, exhibits and answers under oath to written interrogatories propounded by the judge. Affidavits may be submitted and considered as a part of the record.
3. In any case in which the record is expanded, copies of proposed letters, documents, exhibits and affidavits must be submitted to the party against whom they are to be offered, and the party must be afforded an opportunity to admit or deny their correctness.
4. The court must require the authentication of any material submitted pursuant to subsection 2 or 3.
2. The expanded record may include, without limitation, letters which predate the filing of the petition in the district court, documents, exhibits and answers under oath to written interrogatories propounded by the judge. Affidavits may be submitted and considered as a part of the record.
3. In any case in which the record is expanded, copies of proposed letters, documents, exhibits and affidavits must be submitted to the party against whom they are to be offered, and the party must be afforded an opportunity to admit or deny their correctness.
4. The court must require the authentication of any material submitted pursuant to subsection 2 or 3.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Nevada?
Find a Nevada lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.