Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62D.010

This is the official text of Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62D.010, part of Nevada’s Rev. Stat — part of the compiled statutory law of Nevada, published by the state as "Rev. Stat." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Manner for conducting proceedings; proceeding open to public; exception

Official statutory text

1. Each proceeding conducted pursuant to the provisions of this title: (a) Is not criminal in nature. (b) Must be heard separately from the trial of cases against adults. (c) Must be heard without a jury. (d) May be conducted in an informal manner. (e) May be held at a facility for the detention of children or elsewhere at the discretion of the juvenile court. (f) Does not require stenographic notes or any other transcript of the proceeding unless ordered by the juvenile court.

2. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, each proceeding conducted pursuant to the provisions of this title must be open to the public. If the juvenile court determines that all or part of the proceeding must be closed to the public because the closure is in the best interests of the child or the public: (a) The public must be excluded; and (b) The juvenile court may order that only those persons who have a direct interest in the case may be admitted. The juvenile court may determine that a victim or any member of the victim's family is a person who has a direct interest in the case and may be admitted.

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in Nevada?

Find a Nevada lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.