Nev. Rev. Stat. § 90.430
This is the official text of Nev. Rev. Stat. § 90.430, part of Nevada’s Rev. Stat — part of the compiled statutory law of Nevada, published by the state as "Rev. Stat." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Denial, suspension, revocation, fine or condition on grounds of lack of qualification
Official statutory text
The Administrator's determination that an applicant or licensed person lacks qualification under NRS 90.420 is limited by the following provisions:
1. The Administrator may not enter an order against a broker-dealer because of the lack of qualification of: (a) A person other than the broker-dealer if the broker-dealer is a natural person; or (b) A sales representative of the broker-dealer.
2. The Administrator may not enter an order against an investment adviser because of the lack of qualification of: (a) A person other than the investment adviser, if the investment adviser is a natural person; or (b) Any representative of an investment adviser or other person who represents the investment adviser in doing an act that makes the person an investment adviser.
3. The Administrator may not enter an order solely on the basis of lack of experience if the applicant or registrant is qualified by training or knowledge, or both.
4. The Administrator shall consider that: (a) A sales representative who will work under the supervision of a licensed broker-dealer need not have the same qualifications as a broker-dealer; and (b) A representative of an investment adviser who will work under the supervision of a licensed investment adviser need not have the same qualifications as an investment adviser.
5. The Administrator shall consider that an investment adviser is not necessarily qualified solely on the basis of experience as a broker-dealer or sales representative.
1. The Administrator may not enter an order against a broker-dealer because of the lack of qualification of: (a) A person other than the broker-dealer if the broker-dealer is a natural person; or (b) A sales representative of the broker-dealer.
2. The Administrator may not enter an order against an investment adviser because of the lack of qualification of: (a) A person other than the investment adviser, if the investment adviser is a natural person; or (b) Any representative of an investment adviser or other person who represents the investment adviser in doing an act that makes the person an investment adviser.
3. The Administrator may not enter an order solely on the basis of lack of experience if the applicant or registrant is qualified by training or knowledge, or both.
4. The Administrator shall consider that: (a) A sales representative who will work under the supervision of a licensed broker-dealer need not have the same qualifications as a broker-dealer; and (b) A representative of an investment adviser who will work under the supervision of a licensed investment adviser need not have the same qualifications as an investment adviser.
5. The Administrator shall consider that an investment adviser is not necessarily qualified solely on the basis of experience as a broker-dealer or sales representative.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Nevada?
Find a Nevada lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.