Internal prototype — noindexed, not linked from public navigation yet.

N.Y. CCA Law § 208

This is the official text of N.Y. CCA Law § 208, part of New York’s CCA Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "CCA Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Counterclaims

Official statutory text

§ 208. Counterclaims. The court shall have jurisdiction of\ncounterclaims as follows:\n (a) Of any counterclaim the subject matter of which would be within\nthe jurisdiction of the court if sued upon separately.\n (b) Of any counterclaim for money only, without regard to amount.\n (c) Of any counterclaim for:\n 1. the rescission or reformation of the transaction upon which the\nplaintiff's cause of action is founded, if the amount in controversy on\nsuch counterclaim does not exceed $50,000; or\n 2. an accounting between partners after the dissolution of the\npartnership, where the book value of the partnership assets does not\nexceed $50,000 and the plaintiff's cause of action arises out of the\npartnership.\n (d) In an action commenced in the housing part by the city department\ncharged with enforcing the multiple dwelling law, housing maintenance\ncode, or other state or local laws applicable to the enforcement of\nproper housing standards, no counterclaim may be interposed or\nmaintained except if it relates to an action or proceeding specified in\nsubdivision (a) of § 110 of this act.\n

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in New York?

Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.