N.Y. CPL Law § 170.70
This is the official text of N.Y. CPL Law § 170.70, part of New York’s CPL Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "CPL Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Release of defendant upon failure to replace misdemeanor complaint by information
Official statutory text
§ 170.70 Release of defendant upon failure to replace misdemeanor\n complaint by information.\n Upon application of a defendant against whom a misdemeanor complaint\nis pending in a local criminal court, and who, either at the time of his\narraignment thereon or subsequent thereto, has been committed to the\ncustody of the sheriff pending disposition of the action, and who has\nbeen confined in such custody for a period of more than five days, not\nincluding Sunday, without any information having been filed in\nreplacement of such misdemeanor complaint, the criminal court must\nrelease the defendant on his own recognizance unless:\n 1. The defendant has waived prosecution by information and consented\nto be prosecuted upon the misdemeanor complaint, pursuant to subdivision\nthree of section 170.65; or\n 2. The court is satisfied that there is good cause why such order of\nrelease should not be issued. Such good cause must consist of some\ncompelling fact or circumstance which precluded replacement of the\nmisdemeanor complaint by an information or a prosecutor's information\nwithin the prescribed period.\n
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in New York?
Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.