N.Y. EPT Law § 10-6.1
This is the official text of N.Y. EPT Law § 10-6.1, part of New York’s EPT Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "EPT Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Exercise of a power of appointment; manifestation of intention
Official statutory text
§ 10-6.1 Exercise of a power of appointment; manifestation of intention\n of donee\n (a) Subject to paragraph (b), an effective exercise of a power of\nappointment does not require an express reference to such power. A power\nis effectively exercised if the donee manifests his intention to\nexercise it. Such a manifestation exists when the donee:\n (1) Declares in substance that he is exercising all the powers he has;\n (2) Sufficiently identifying the appointive property or any part\nthereof, executes an instrument purporting to dispose of such property\nor part;\n (3) Makes a disposition which, when read with reference to the\nproperty he owned and the circumstances existing at the time of its\nmaking, manifests his understanding that he was disposing of the\nappointive property; or\n (4) Leaves a will disposing of all of his property or all of his\nproperty of the kind covered by the power, unless the intention that the\nwill is not to operate as an execution of the power appears expressly or\nby necessary implication.\n (b) If the donor has expressly directed that no instrument shall be\neffective to exercise the power unless it contains a specific reference\nto the power, an instrument not containing such reference does not\nvalidly exercise the power.\n
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in New York?
Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.