Internal prototype — noindexed, not linked from public navigation yet.

N.Y. FIS Law § 608

This is the official text of N.Y. FIS Law § 608, part of New York’s FIS Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "FIS Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Payment for independent dispute resolution entity

Official statutory text

§ 608. Payment for independent dispute resolution entity. (a) For\ndisputes involving an insured, when the independent dispute resolution\nentity determines the health care plan's payment is reasonable, payment\nfor the dispute resolution process shall be the responsibility of the\nnon-participating provider. When the independent dispute resolution\nentity determines the non-participating provider's fee is reasonable,\npayment for the dispute resolution process shall be the responsibility\nof the health care plan. When a good faith negotiation directed by the\nindependent dispute resolution entity pursuant to paragraph four of\nsubsection (a) of section six hundred five of this article, or paragraph\nsix of subsection (a) of section six hundred seven of this article\nresults in a settlement between the health care plan and\nnon-participating provider, the health care plan and the\nnon-participating provider shall evenly divide and share the prorated\ncost for dispute resolution.\n * (b) For disputes involving a patient that is not an insured, when\nthe independent dispute resolution entity determines the physician's fee\nis reasonable, payment for the dispute resolution process shall be the\nresponsibility of the patient unless payment for the dispute resolution\nprocess would pose a hardship to the patient. The superintendent shall\npromulgate a regulation to determine payment for the dispute resolution\nprocess in cases of hardship. When the independent dispute resolution\nentity determines the physician's fee is unreasonable, payment for the\ndispute resolution process shall be the responsibility of the physician.\n * NB Effective until August 26, 2026\n * (b) (1) A non-participating provider and a health care plan shall\nsubmit full payment for the dispute resolution process upon submission\nof the dispute resolution application or, if the responding party, when\nresponding to the independent dispute resolution entity's request for\neligibility information and supporting documents.\n (2) An independent dispute resolution entity shall not comingle the\npayments for the dispute resolution process with any other funds held by\nthe entity and shall hold all payments in a separate account.\n (3) An independent dispute resolution entity shall issue a refund of\nthe dispute resolution process payment to the prevailing party within\nthirty days of rendering a determination on the dispute or rejecting the\ndispute as ineligible.\n * NB Effective August 26, 2026\n * (c) For disputes involving a patient that is not an insured, when\nthe independent dispute resolution entity determines the physician's fee\nis reasonable, payment for the dispute resolution process shall be the\nresponsibility of the patient unless payment for the dispute resolution\nprocess would pose a hardship to the patient. The superintendent shall\npromulgate a regulation to determine payment for the dispute resolution\nprocess in cases of hardship. When the independent dispute resolution\nentity determines the physician's fee is unreasonable, payment for the\ndispute resolution process shall be the responsibility of the physician.\n * NB Effective August 26, 2026\n

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in New York?

Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.