N.Y. LIE Law § 209
This is the official text of N.Y. LIE Law § 209, part of New York’s LIE Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "LIE Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Action in inferior court
Official statutory text
§ 209. Action in inferior court. Where the action is brought in a\ncourt, other than one of those specified in section two hundred and\nseven, if the plaintiff is not in possession of the chattel, a warrant,\ncommanding the proper officer to seize the chattel, and safely keep it\nto abide the judgment, may be issued, in like manner as a warrant of\nattachment may be issued in an action founded upon a contract, brought\nin the same court; and the provisions of law, applicable to a warrant of\nattachment, issued out of that court, apply to a warrant, issued as\nprescribed in this section, and to the proceedings to procure it, and\nafter it has been issued; except as otherwise specified in the judgment.\nA judgment in favor of the plaintiff, in such an action, must correspond\nto a judgment, rendered as prescribed in the last section, except that\nit must direct the sale of the chattel by an officer to whom an\nexecution, issued out of the court, may be directed; and the payment of\nthe surplus, if its safekeeping is necessary, to the county treasurer,\nfor the benefit of the owner.\n
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in New York?
Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.