N.Y. MIL Law § 75
This is the official text of N.Y. MIL Law § 75, part of New York’s MIL Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "MIL Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Efficiency or fitness examining boards and medical examining boards
Official statutory text
§ 75. Efficiency or fitness examining boards and medical examining\nboards. 1. The efficiency, moral character, conduct and general fitness\nfor retention in the organized militia of any commissioned officer may\nbe investigated, examined into and determined by an efficiency or\nfitness examining board. The members of an efficiency or fitness\nexamining board shall be senior in rank to the officer under\ninvestigation unless unavoidable.\n 2. The physical fitness for further service of any commissioned\nofficer in the organized militia may be investigated and determined by a\nmedical examining board of officers.\n 3. Efficiency or fitness examining boards and medical examining boards\nshall be appointed by the governor upon the recommendation of the\nadjutant general; provided, that whenever an examining board shall be\nappointed for the purpose of determining the fitness of any officer for\ncontinued federal recognition, such board shall be appointed by the\ncommander designated, and shall follow the practice and procedure\nprescribed in the applicable laws of the United States and the\nregulations issued thereunder.\n
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in New York?
Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.