N.Y. RAT Law § 107
This is the official text of N.Y. RAT Law § 107, part of New York’s RAT Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "RAT Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Pending actions and proceedings
Official statutory text
§ 107. Pending actions and proceedings. This chapter shall not affect\nany action or proceeding, civil or criminal, brought by or against the\ntransit commission, or the former transit construction commissioner,\npublic service commission for the first district, or the board of rapid\ntransit railroad commissioners in respect of rights, powers, duties and\nobligations transferred to and conferred upon the board of\ntransportation; but such action or proceeding may be prosecuted or\ndefended in the name of the board of transportation and, upon\napplication to the court, the board of transportation shall be\nsubstituted as a party in such pending action or proceeding. Any\ninvestigation, examination or hearing, undertaken, commenced or\ninstituted by the transit commission or the transit construction\ncommissioner or the public service commission for the first district or\nthe board of rapid transit railroad commissioners before the time this\narticle takes effect, and relating to a subject or matter jurisdiction\nwhereof was transferred to the board of transportation, may be conducted\nto final determination by the board of transportation.\n
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in New York?
Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.