N.Y. RAT Law § 111
This is the official text of N.Y. RAT Law § 111, part of New York’s RAT Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "RAT Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Legislative intent
Official statutory text
§ 111. Legislative intent. Insofar as this chapter revises,\nconsolidates, codifies, continues or restates the provisions of the\nrapid transit act, as amended and supplemented, and articles seven and\neight of the public service law in force when this chapter shall take\neffect, such provisions shall be deemed unchanged in substance and\neffect. If in this chapter there shall have been incorporated any\nprovision of law that heretofore shall have been superseded or\nspecifically or impliedly repealed, the incorporation of any such\nprovision shall not revive such superseded or repealed provision, nor\nshall such incorporation be construed to indicate any legislative\ndetermination that such provision had not been theretofore so superseded\nor repealed. If in this chapter there shall have been incorporated any\nnew provision, which is not a revision, consolidation, codification,\ncontinuance or restatement of the provisions of the rapid transit act,\nas amended and supplemented, and articles seven and eight of the public\nservice law in force when this chapter shall take effect, such new\nprovision shall not become effective, but shall be deemed an\ninadvertence or error.\n
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in New York?
Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.