Internal prototype — noindexed, not linked from public navigation yet.

N.Y. RSS Law § 607-H

This is the official text of N.Y. RSS Law § 607-H, part of New York’s RSS Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "RSS Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Disability benefits; Westchester county district attorney investigators

Official statutory text

§ 607-h. Disability benefits; Westchester county district attorney\ninvestigators. The county of Westchester may elect to make the benefits\nprovided in this section available to criminal investigators, senior\ncriminal investigators, deputy chief criminal investigators, and chief\ncriminal investigators who are in the employ of the Westchester county\ndistrict attorney. Notwithstanding any provision of this chapter or any\ngeneral or special law to the contrary, any condition of impairment of\nhealth caused by diseases of the heart, resulting in the disability or\ndeath to a member covered by this section, presently employed and who\nshall have sustained such disability while so employed, who successfully\npassed a physical examination on entry into service as a member covered\nby this section, which examination failed to disclose evidence of any\ndisease or other impairment of the heart, shall be presumptive evidence\nthat it was incurred in the performance and discharge of duty, unless\nthe contrary can be proved by competent evidence.\n

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in New York?

Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.