N.Y. SCP Law § 1603
This is the official text of N.Y. SCP Law § 1603, part of New York’s SCP Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "SCP Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Effect of right to contest or of revocation 1
Official statutory text
§ 1603. Effect of right to contest or of revocation\n 1. If under the law of the testator's domicile the probate or\nestablishment of his will therein is subject to contest within a time\nspecified after probate or establishment, no property shall be\ntransmitted to the domicile or distributed to beneficiaries under the\nwill during such period of time unless the court which granted ancillary\nprobate authorizes such transmission or distribution upon proof that\n (a) 7 months have elapsed since the issuance of ancillary letters in\nthis state,\n (b) a contest of the will is not pending in the testator's domicile\nand\n (c) either the time provided in the domicile for the institution of a\ncontest has expired or one year has expired since the will was admitted\nto ancillary probate under this article.\n 2. An ancillary fiduciary who transmits assets to the domicile or\ndistributes to beneficiaries in good faith and pursuant to an order or\ndecree under subdivision 1 shall be discharged from any liability even\nif the probate or establishment of the will at the domicile is\nthereafter set aside or revoked for any cause whatever.\n
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in New York?
Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.