N.Y. SCP Law § 1918
This is the official text of N.Y. SCP Law § 1918, part of New York’s SCP Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "SCP Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Right of life tenant to be considered in disposition; distribution of moneys realized
Official statutory text
§ 1918. Right of life tenant to be considered in disposition;\n distribution of moneys realized.\n 1. Where any party to the proceeding has an existing or inchoate\nright of dower or curtesy or where any party to the proceeding has a\ntendancy by dower or curtesy or an estate for life or for years in the\nreal property the court must determine whether the interests of all the\nparties will be better protected or a more advantageous disposition can\nbe made of the real property by including the disposition of such right\nor interest and if the court shall so determine there may be included in\nthe order a direction that such right or interest be included in the\ndisposition.\n 2. The provisions of law in relation to the right of dower, curtesy\nand estates for life, or for years or future or other interests in\nactions for the partition of real estate, so far as the same may be\napplicable, shall govern and control the distribution of moneys realized\non such disposition which shall belong to the owner of such right of\ndower or curtesy, or tenant for life, or for years or future or other\ninterests.\n
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in New York?
Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.