Internal prototype — noindexed, not linked from public navigation yet.

N.Y. SOS Law § 477

This is the official text of N.Y. SOS Law § 477, part of New York’s SOS Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "SOS Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Dutchess county

Official statutory text

§ 477. Dutchess county. 1. All mentally ill, developmentally disabled,\nblind and deaf and mute persons, the expense of whose support and\nmaintenance now is, or, under the laws of the state of New York, may\nbecome a charge upon the city of Poughkeepsie, or the county of\nDutchess, exclusive of said city, or both, and who are maintained, or\nshall be maintained, in any of the institutions of the state of New\nYork, shall be supported by said county of Dutchess as one district.\n 2. All institutions in the state of New York maintaining any such\nperson whose support is properly chargeable, or shall be properly\nchargeable, to said city or county, are hereby required to render to the\ncounty treasurer of said county all bills for the support of such\npersons without any distinction between those persons from the different\nparts of said county.\n 3. This section shall not be held to affect chapter two hundred and\neighty-six of the laws of eighteen hundred and sixty-three, an act for\nthe better support of the poor in the city of Poughkeepsie, except as to\nthe class of persons herein named.\n

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in New York?

Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.