N.Y. UCC Law § 9-105

This is the official text of N.Y. UCC Law § 9-105, part of New York’s UCC Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "UCC Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Control of Electronic Copy of Record Evidencing Chattel Paper

Official statutory text

Section 9--105. Control of Electronic Copy of Record Evidencing Chattel\n Paper.\n (a) General rule: control of electronic copy of record evidencing\nchattel paper. A purchaser has control of an authoritative electronic\ncopy of a record evidencing chattel paper if a system employed for\nevidencing the assignment of interests in the chattel paper reliably\nestablishes the purchaser as the person to which the authoritative\nelectronic copy was assigned.\n (b) Single authoritative copy. A system satisfies subsection (a) if\nthe record or records evidencing the chattel paper are created, stored,\nand assigned in a manner that:\n (1) a single authoritative copy of the record or records exists\n which is unique, identifiable and, except as otherwise\n provided in paragraphs (4), (5), and (6), unalterable;\n (2) the authoritative copy identifies the secured party as the\n assignee of the record or records;\n (3) the authoritative copy is communicated to and maintained by\n the secured party or its designated custodian;\n (4) copies or revisions that add or change an identified assignee\n of the authoritative copy can be made only with the\n participation of the secured party;\n (5) each copy of the authoritative copy and any copy of a copy is\n readily identifiable as a copy that is not the authoritative\n copy; and\n (6) any revision of the authoritative copy is readily\n identifiable as an authorized or unauthorized revision.\n (c) One or more authoritative copies. A system satisfies subsection\n(a), and a purchaser has control of an authoritative electronic copy of\na record evidencing chattel paper, if the electronic copy, a record\nattached to or logically associated with the electronic copy, or a\nsystem in which the electronic copy is recorded:\n (1) enables the purchaser readily to identify each electronic copy as\neither an authoritative copy or a nonauthoritative copy;\n (2) enables the purchaser readily to identify itself in any way,\nincluding by name, identifying number, cryptographic key, office, or\naccount number, as the assignee of the authoritative electronic copy;\nand\n (3) gives the purchaser exclusive power, subject to subsection (d),\nto:\n (A) prevent others from adding or changing an identified assignee of\nthe authoritative electronic copy; and\n (B) transfer control of the authoritative electronic copy.\n (d) Meaning of exclusive. Subject to subsection (e), a power is\nexclusive under subsection (c)(3)(A) and (B) even if:\n (1) the authoritative electronic copy, a record attached to or\nlogically associated with the authoritative electronic copy, or a system\nin which the authoritative electronic copy is recorded limits the use of\nthe authoritative electronic copy or has a protocol programmed to cause\na change, including a transfer or loss of control; or\n (2) the power is shared with another person.\n (e) When power not shared with another person. A power of a purchaser\nis not shared with another person under subsection (d)(2) and the\npurchaser's power is not exclusive if:\n (1) the purchaser can exercise the power only if the power also is\nexercised by the other person; and\n (2) the other person:\n (A) can exercise the power without exercise of the power by the\npurchaser; or\n (B) is the transferor to the purchaser of an interest in the chattel\npaper.\n (f) Presumption of exclusivity of certain powers. If a purchaser has\nthe powers specified in subsection (c)(3)(A) and (B), the powers are\npresumed to be exclusive.\n (g) Obtaining control through another person
(2) the other person:\n (A) can exercise the power without exercise of the power by the\npurchaser; or\n (B) is the transferor to the purchaser of an interest in the chattel\npaper.\n (f) Presumption of exclusivity of certain powers. If a purchaser has\nthe powers specified in subsection (c)(3)(A) and (B), the powers are\npresumed to be exclusive.\n (g) Obtaining control through another person. A purchaser has control\nof an authoritative electronic copy of a record evidencing chattel paper\nif another person, other than the transferor to the purchaser of an\ninterest in the chattel paper:\n (1) has control of the authoritative electronic copy and acknowledges\nthat it has control on behalf of the purchaser; or\n (2) obtains control of the authoritative electronic copy after having\nacknowledged that it will obtain control of the electronic copy on\nbehalf of the purchaser.\n

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in New York?

Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.