N.D. Cent. Code § 6-06-10

This is the official text of N.D. Cent. Code § 6-06-10, part of North Dakota’s Cent. Code — part of the compiled statutory law of North Dakota, published by the state as "Cent. Code." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

6-06-10. General and special meetings - Notice - Quorum - Voting privileges

Official statutory text

6-06-10. General and special meetings - Notice - Quorum - Voting privileges

General and special meetings may be held in the manner and for the purposes indicated in

the bylaws of the credit union. Ten days before any regular or special meeting, written notice

thereof must be mailed or sent by an electronic communication to each member and, in the

case of a special meeting, the notice must state clearly the purpose of the meeting and what

matters will be considered thereat. The members present at a general or special meeting

constitute a quorum for the transaction of the business of the credit union. At all meetings, a

member has but a single vote, whatever the member's shareholdings. There is no voting by

proxy, but any firm, society, or corporation having a membership in the credit union may cast its

vote by one person upon presentation by that person to the credit union of written authority from

such firm, society, or corporation. The credit union may allow members to vote by mail ballot or

electronic ballot for directors and committee members.

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in North Dakota?

Find a North Dakota lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.