N.D. Cent. Code § 6-13-08
This is the official text of N.D. Cent. Code § 6-13-08, part of North Dakota’s Cent. Code — part of the compiled statutory law of North Dakota, published by the state as "Cent. Code." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
6-13-08. Privilege - Burden of proof - Stipulation
Official statutory text
6-13-08. Privilege - Burden of proof - Stipulation
A financial institution asserting the compliance self-critical analysis privilege set forth in this
chapter has the burden of demonstrating the applicability of the privilege. Once a financial
institution has established the applicability of the privilege, a party seeking disclosure has the
burden of proving that the privilege is asserted for a fraudulent purpose. The commissioner,
state's attorney, or attorney general seeking disclosure of the privilege has the burden of proving
the elements set forth in subdivisions a and c of subsection 3 of section 6-13-06.
The parties may at any time stipulate in proceedings under section 6-13-06 or 6-13-07 to
entry of an order directing whether the specific information contained in a compliance
self-critical analysis audit document is or is not subject to the privilege provided under this
chapter. Any such stipulation may be limited to the instant proceeding and, absent specific
language to the contrary, is not applicable to any other proceeding.
A financial institution asserting the compliance self-critical analysis privilege set forth in this
chapter has the burden of demonstrating the applicability of the privilege. Once a financial
institution has established the applicability of the privilege, a party seeking disclosure has the
burden of proving that the privilege is asserted for a fraudulent purpose. The commissioner,
state's attorney, or attorney general seeking disclosure of the privilege has the burden of proving
the elements set forth in subdivisions a and c of subsection 3 of section 6-13-06.
The parties may at any time stipulate in proceedings under section 6-13-06 or 6-13-07 to
entry of an order directing whether the specific information contained in a compliance
self-critical analysis audit document is or is not subject to the privilege provided under this
chapter. Any such stipulation may be limited to the instant proceeding and, absent specific
language to the contrary, is not applicable to any other proceeding.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in North Dakota?
Find a North Dakota lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.