Okla. Stat. tit. 11, § 11-37-221

This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 11, § 11-37-221, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 11, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 11,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Correction and confirmation of apportionment

Official statutory text

Any owner of real estate proposed to be assessed may, at or

prior to the hearing on the apportionment, file his objections in

writing against the validity of the assessment roll and proposed

assessment, setting forth the nature thereof, and shall have full

opportunity to be heard. The governing body shall make such

adjustments as may be just and proper. Any and all objections to

the amount and validity of the assessments shall be deemed waived

unless presented at the time and in the manner herein specified. At

the hearing on the apportionment, or any adjournment thereof, the

municipal governing body may review and correct the apportionment

and raise or lower the same as to any lots or tracts of land, as it

shall deem just. The governing body by resolution shall confirm the

apportionment and assessment as so revised and corrected by it. The

determination by the governing body of the existence and extent of

special benefit to each tract or parcel of land in the district is

hereby declared to be legislative in nature, and shall be conclusive

upon the property owners and upon the courts.

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?

Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.