Internal prototype — noindexed, not linked from public navigation yet.

Okla. Stat. tit. 14A, § 14A-4-104

This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 14A, § 14A-4-104, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 14A, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 14A,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Creditor's provision of and charge for insurance -

Official statutory text

Excess amount of charge.

(1) Except as otherwise provided in this article and subject to

the provisions on additional charges (Section 2-202 and Section 3-

202) and maximum charges (Part 2 of Article 2 and Article 3), a

creditor may agree to provide insurance, and may contract for and

receive a charge for insurance separate from and in addition to

other charges. A creditor need not make a separate charge for

insurance provided or required by him. This act does not authorize

the issuance of any insurance prohibited under any statute, or rule

thereunder, governing the business of insurance.

(2) The excess amount of a charge for insurance provided for in

agreements in violation of this article is an excess charge for the

purposes of the provisions of the article on remedies and penalties

(Article 5) as to effect of violations on rights of parties (Section

5-202) and of the provisions of the article on administration

(Article 6) as to civil actions by the Administrator (Section 6-

113).

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?

Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.